Town of
Board of Commissioners Regular
Meeting
MINUTES
The Holly Springs
Town Board of Commissioners met in regular session on
Board Members Present: Commissioners Parrish Womble,
Mike Taylor, Chet VanFossen, Peter Atwell and Hank Dickson and Mayor Sears.
Board Members Absent:
None.
Staff Members Present:
Carl Dean, town manager; Charles Simmons, assistant town manager; John
Schifano, town attorney; Joni Powell, town clerk (recording the minutes); Linda
R. Harper, deputy town clerk; Tamara Ward, public information officer; Drew
Holland, finance director; Heather Keefer, environmental engineer; Martha
Daniel-Hobbs, town planner; Cecil Parker, chief of public safety; Alysia
Bailey, senior planner; and Gina Bobber, planning director.
2 and 3. The pledge of allegiance was recited, and the
meeting opened with an invocation by Rev. Hal Adkins, pastor of the
4. Agenda Adjustment: The
Motion By: Atwell
Second By:
Vote: Unanimous.
Items Added
to the Agenda: Commissioner Atwell
requested a brief closed session, pursuant to G.S. 143-318.11(a)(3), to consult
with the Town Attorney under the attorney-client privilege regarding the
proposed service area agreement between the towns of
Agenda
Items Removed: None.
Other
Changes: None.
5a. Holly Springs
Yellow Jackets Cheerleading Squad Presentation - Commissioner
Dickson presented certificates of recognition to the Holly Springs Yellow
Jackets cheerleading team that earned 2nd Place overall in the East
Wake Conference Mini Mite Cheerleading Division. The certificates were presented on behalf of
the Board of Commissioners.
Action: The Board approved a motion to enter into Closed Session
pursuant to G.S. 143-318.11(a)(3), to consult with the Town Attorney under the
attorney-client privilege regarding the proposed service area agreement between
the towns of
. Motion
By: Atwell
Second
By: Dickson
Vote:
Unanimous
General Account Closed Session –
The Board discussed
with the Town Attorney the matter of a pending annexation boundary between the
towns of
‑ End General Account
Action: The Board approved a motion to reenter to Open Session.
Motion
By: Atwell
Second
By: Womble
Vote:
Unanimous
6a. Town of Holly
Springs and Town of Cary Annexation Agreement
- Mr. Dean reviewed with the Board some of the history of this issue and then
outlined his reasons for recommending the annexation agreement be approved with
the original proposed dividing line, with a few minor modifications to
accommodate property owners who have requested to be included on the Holly
Springs side of the line, to wit: property owned by Scott and Angela Coulter,
Alice Watson, and Willie and Dora Watson.
Mr. Dean reported that Town of
Over the last two weeks, Mr. Dean
reported, he and Mayor Sears had met with Cary Mayor Ernie McAllister and Cary
Town Manager Bill Coleman. Mr. Dean
reported to the Board that the Town of
Mr. Dean said he recommends adoption
of the original line as proposed in October with minor modifications for the
following reasons:
1.
The original line was negotiated in what would be the most
cost-efficient way for provision of municipal utilities, and it would designate
a planning service area but would not annex any property. Unless a property owner requests annexation
and provision of municipal water and sewer services, Mr. Dean said, it is very
unlikely the Town of Holly Springs would pursue involuntary annexation on its
side of the line in the foreseeable future.
2.
If
3.
It would be a decision that would be the best business decision for
those who live inside the current town limits of
In discussion, some board members
expressed their feelings about some of the information and misinformation that
has been broadcast and printed in the media.
In the end, Mayor Sears said, the
Town of Holly Springs attempted to accommodate some of those property owners
who had provided input during public hearings on the proposed agreement. Having tried to respond to citizen input,
Mayor Sears said he felt the Town of Holly Springs had done all it could to act
within the spirit of the state laws relating to municipal annexation
agreements.
Action:
The Board approved a motion to enter into an annexation agreement with the
Town of
Motion
By: Dickson
Second
By: Womble
Vote:
Unanimous
A
copy of the annexation agreement is incorporated into these minutes as addendum
pages.
6b. 03-REZ-06, Holly
Meadow Drive property - Ms. Bailey
explained that a public hearing was held Nov. 18, 2003 on the proposed Zoning
Map Change for property located along Holly Meadow Drive. She said at that time, comments were made
regarding the impact of this zoning map change on the adjacent properties
within the Holly Glen Subdivision. She
said the applicant requested that action be tabled until Dec. 16.
Ms. Bailey said the applicant is
proposing to rezone +/‑ 0.67 acres
from NV:
Mr. Tom Spaulding addressed the
Board, explaining that the developer intends to build model homes on the
property and feels the request is compatible with the surrounding
property. He said the 20-foot rear
buffer would not be disturbed. He said
he felt the model homes would provide a service to the subdivision because
potential homebuyers could stop into those two models rather than driving
through the subdivision.
Action:
The Board approved a motion to approve Zoning Map Change Petition #03‑REZ‑06
to rezone property containing 0.665 acres of property located along Holly
Meadow Drive, more particularly described as Wake County PIN 0648.01‑35‑1214,
from NV: Neighborhood Village district to R‑10: Residential district as
submitted by Spaulding & Norris, PA.
Motion
By: VanFossen
Second
By: Dickson
Vote:
Unanimous
7a. Public Hearing:
Annexation Ordinance A03-03, Angela and Scott Coulter - Ms. Bobber said the Town has received a petition for
voluntary annexation of land containing 1.37 acres located at
With that explanation completed,
Mayor Sears opened the public hearing to accept input. The following comments were recorded: None.
There being no comments, the public
hearing was closed.
Action:
The Board approved a motion to defer consideration of Annexation Ordinance
A03‑03 until the legalities of the petition are determined due to the
property’s proximity to the
Motion
By: VanFossen
Second
By: Atwell
Vote:
Unanimous
7b. Public Hearing:
03-REZ-07, 517 St. Croix Drive - Ms. Bailey said this request is to rezone
property containing +/‑ 2.50 acres located on the east side of North Main
Street, directly east of Windward Pointe, and north of the Jones Park. She said the town is proposing to rezone this
property due to the fact that the Town’s Official Zoning Map indicates that the
property is a part of the Windcrest Planned Unit
Development located to the north. The
parcel, however, is not a part of the Windcrest
PUD. Ms. Bailey said that in order to
correct this discrepancy, the town must rezone the property to R‑20:
Residential district, the original zoning of the property. She said that R-20 zoning district also would
be consistent with the town’s Ten‑Year Comprehensive Growth Plan, which
has this area designated for moderate-density development.
With that explanation completed,
Mayor Sears opened the public hearing to accept input. The following comments were recorded: None
There being no comments, the public
hearing was closed.
Action:
The Board approved a motion to approve Zoning Map Change Petition #03‑REZ‑07
to rezone 2.50 acres of land described as Wake County PIN 0659.01‑05‑7574
from PUD: Windcrest Planned Unit Development to R‑20:
Residential District as submitted by the Town of Holly Springs.
Motion
By: VanFossen
Second
By: Atwell
Vote:
Unanimous
7c. Public Hearing:
03-REZ-12, Holly Springs Road
- Ms. Bailey said this request is to rezone property containing +/‑ 4.00
acres located on the north side of Holly Springs Road directly to the east of
the Cobble Ridge Subdivision and north of Holly Ridge Elementary and Middle
School site. Ms. Bailey said the town is
proposing to rezone this property due to the fact that the Official Zoning Map
indicates that the property is zoned R‑20: Residential district. She said that a rezoning request was
submitted and approved to change the zoning of this property in 2001. However, during the drafting of the new
Official Zoning Map with the adoption of the UDO, the zoning of this parcel was
inadvertently changed back to R‑20, she said. Ms. Bailey said that in order to correct this
discrepancy, the town is initiating a zoning map change to reflect the request
made with Rezoning Petition #01‑REZ‑05, that was originally
approved on
With that explanation completed,
Mayor Sears opened the public hearing to accept input. The following comments were recorded: None.
There being no comments, the public
hearing was closed.
Action:
The Board approved a motion to approve Zoning Map Change Petition #03‑REZ‑12
to rezone 4.00 acres of property described as Wake County PIN 0659.14‑44‑8330
from R‑20: Residential district to R‑10: Residential district as
submitted by the Town of Holly Springs.
Motion
By: Dickson
Second
By: Atwell
Vote:
Unanimous
7d. Public Hearing:
03-SEU-04, Holly Springs High School
- Ms. Daniel-Hobbs explained to the Board that this proposal is for the
approval of Special Exception Use Petition #03‑SEU‑04 of 92.57
acres of property located at Avent Ferry and Cass Holt Roads. She said the
applicant is proposing to construct a
high school with extensive recreational facilities, which is allowed in an R‑30:
Residential district as a Special Exception.
She said the Special Exception Use #03‑SEU‑04 application is
compatible with the medium‑density designation of the property in the
Comprehensive Growth Plan.
Ms. Hobbs explained that the project
meets the development standards of the UDO with the exception of the following
issues, which could be addressed through the consideration of waivers:
•
The applicant
requests a Waiver of UDO Regulations in order to install a B‑75 buffer
along major thoroughfares for the purpose of security.
•
The applicant
requests a Waiver of UDO Regulations in order to utilize more than three
building material colors in the architectural design of the high school.
•
The applicant
requests a Waiver of UDO Regulations for a maximum building height of 65 feet.
Staff requested a full color rendering in the photographic style of the entire
building; however, the project architect could not provide that rendering at
this time.
•
The applicant
requests a Waiver of UDO Regulations to use sodium lighting rather than white
light source lighting in the parking areas. In addition, the applicant is
requesting that the Board of Commissioners allow the sport and athletic field
lighting to exceed the maximum lighting level of 0.3 foot‑candles at lot
line during tournament‑level events.
Ms. Hobbs said that
Ms. Hobbs said there are several
areas of wetlands within the site and a planned sewer line will cross these
wetlands and may require additional plans and permits.
She summarized the numerous items
under consideration by the Board:
1.
Findings of
Fact for a high school use.
2.
Findings of
Fact and action on the applicant’s request for temporary mobile classrooms in
association with a high school use, if needed.
3.
Findings of
Fact and waiver of development standards and action on a reduction in landscape
bufer.
4.
Fidings of Fact and waiver of development standards and action on
an increase in building height.
5.
Findings of
Fact for a waiver of development standards and action on a non-white light
source.
6.
Findings of
Fact for a waiver of development standards and action on an increase in the
number of building material colors.
7.
Action on a
Special Exception Use for a high school.
With that explanation completed,
Mayor Sears opened the public hearing to accept sworn testimony under oath
administered by Deputy Clerk Linda R. Harper.
The following testimony was recorded:
Jerry Bradley, on behalf of the
applicant – Mr. Bradley submitted the application, site plan and responses
into the record.
Hal Bowen, on behalf of the
applicant – Mr. Bowen told the Board he was available for any questions.
Dennis Pitts, on behalf of the
applicant – Mr. Pitts explained that he represents the landscape architects
for the project. He submitted
information supporting the applicant’s requests for waivers for the
record. He said he felt there was
significant justification for each of the requests, and he stressed that none
of the waivers would reduce the quality of the project.
There being no further testimony,
the public hearing was closed. The
Board asked Lisa Martin of the Planning Board to summarize the Planning Board’s
review of the plan
She said the Planning Board’s
overall response to the plans was positive.
She said the Planning Board had no problem with any of the waiver
requests. She noted that the Planning
Board had questioned the need for temporary mobile classrooms for a campus that would be brand new. It was explained, she said, that the mobile
units would not necessarily be placed on site, but the permission would be
given so that they can be added to the property if and when they are needed in
the future without a further permitting process.
Action #1
Findings of Fact for the Special Exception Use Petition to allow the
development of a high school (consideration of actual approval later in this
meeting, following consideration of waivers): The Board approved a motion to make, accept and direct the
Town Clerk to record in the minutes its findings of fact that Special Exception
Use Petition #03‑SEU‑04, Holly Springs High School, meets the
requirements to allow for the development of a high school as submitted by
McNeely and Associates Project Number HSAHS/H5, dated Revised October 27, 2003.
Motion
By: VanFossen
Second
By: Atwell
Vote:
Unanimous
The Board’s Special Exception Use Findings of Fact:
a. The proposed use will not be injurious
to the public health, safety, comfort, community moral standards, convenience
or general welfare;
b. The proposed use will not injure or
adversely affect the adjacent area;
c. The proposed use will be consistent
with the character of the district, land uses authorized therein, and the Town
of
d. The proposed use shall conform to all
development standards of the applicable district (unless a waiver of such
development standards is requested as part of the special exception use
petition and approved as set forth above, in which case the proposed use shall
conform to the terms and conditions of such waiver).
e. Access drives or driveways are or will
be sufficient in size and properly located to: ensure automotive and pedestrian
safety and convenience, traffic flow as set forth in Section 7.09 – Pedestrian
Circulation and Vehicular Area Design; and, control and access in case of fire
or other emergency;
f. Off‑street parking areas, off‑street
loading areas, trash enclosures, trash pick‑up and removal, and other
service areas are located so as to be safe, convenient, allow for access in
case of emergency, and to minimize economic, glare, odor, and other impacts on
adjoining properties and properties in the general neighborhood;
g. The lot, building or structure proposed
for the use has adequate restroom facilities, cooking facilities, safety
equipment (smoke alarms, floatation devices, etc.), or any other service or
equipment necessary to provide for the needs of those persons whom may work at,
visit or own property nearby to the proposed use;
h. Utilities, schools, fire, police and
other necessary public and private facilities and services will be adequate to
handle the needs of the proposed use;
i. The location and arrangement of the
use on the site, screening, buffering, landscaping, and pedestrian ways
harmonize with adjoining properties and the general area and minimize adverse
impacts; and,
j. The type, size, and intensity of the
proposed use (including but not limited to such considerations as the hours of
operation and numbers of people who are likely to utilize or be attracted to
the use) will not have significant adverse impacts on adjoining properties or
the neighborhood.
Action
#2: Findings of Fact for the Special
Exception Use Petition to allow for the installation of temporary mobile
classrooms: The Board approved a
motion to make and accept its findings of fact and direct the Town Clerk to
record the findings in the minutes for Special Exception Use Petition
03-SEU-04, Holly Springs High School, to allow temporary mobile classrooms as
submitted by McNeely and Associates Project Number HSAHS/H5, dated Revised
October 27, 2003.
In discussion of the motion, Commissioner Dickson noted that he would like some assurance that no mobile units would be placed on the property unless used as classrooms or offices. He said he does not want to see empty units or units’ being used as storage buildings.
Mr. Bowen said school policy would
prohibit their just sitting there for any length of time.
Motion
By: VanFossen
Second
By: Atwell
Vote: Unanimous
Special Exception Use Findings of Fact:
A special exception use may only be
granted upon the presentation of sufficient evidence to enable a written
determination that:
a. The proposed use will not be injurious
to the public health, safety, comfort, community moral standards, convenience
or general welfare;
b. The proposed use will not injure or
adversely affect the adjacent area;
c. The proposed use will be consistent
with the character of the district, land uses authorized therein, and the Town
of
d. The proposed use shall conform to all
development standards of the applicable district (unless a waiver of such
development standards is requested as part of the special exception use
petition and approved as set forth above, in which case the proposed use shall
conform to the terms and conditions of such waiver).
e. Access drives or driveways are or will
be sufficient in size and properly located to: ensure automotive and pedestrian
safety and convenience, traffic flow as set forth in Section 7.09 – Pedestrian
Circulation and Vehicular Area Design; and, control and access in case of fire
or other emergency;
f. Off‑street parking areas, off‑street
loading areas, trash enclosures, trash pick‑up and removal, and other
service areas are located so as to be safe, convenient, allow for access in
case of emergency, and to minimize economic, glare, odor, and other impacts on
adjoining properties and properties in the general neighborhood;
g. The lot, building or structure proposed
for the use has adequate restroom facilities, cooking facilities, safety
equipment (smoke alarms, floatation devices, etc.), or any other service or
equipment necessary to provide for the needs of those persons whom may work at,
visit or own property nearby to the proposed use;
h. Utilities, schools, fire, police and
other necessary public and private facilities and services will be adequate to
handle the needs of the proposed use;
i. The location and arrangement of the
use on the site, screening, buffering, landscaping, and pedestrian ways
harmonize with adjoining properties and the general area and minimize adverse
impacts; and,
j. The type, size, and intensity of the
proposed use (including but not limited to such considerations as the hours of
operation and numbers of people who are likely to utilize or be attracted to
the use) will not have significant adverse impacts on adjoining properties or
the neighborhood.
Action
#3: Action on Mobile Classrooms:
Having made findings of fact that the project will meet the requirements to be
granted a Special Exception Use for mobile classrooms, the Board approved a
motion to approve Special Exception Use Petition 03-SEU-04 to allow for the
installation and use of mobile classroom units as sumbitted
by McNeely and Associates Project Number HSAHS/H5, dated Revised October 27,
2003.
Motion
By: VanFossen
Second
By: Atwell
Vote: Unanimous
Action #4: Findings of Fact for Reduction of Landscape Buffer: The Board approved a motion to to make and accept its findings of fact and direct the Town Clerk to record the findings in the minutes for a waiver to allow the reduction of a B‑225 buffer to a B‑75 buffer along major thoroughfares as submitted by McNeely and Associates, Project Number: HSAHS/H5, dated Revised October 27, 2003.
Motion
By: VanFossen
Second
By: Atwell
Vote:
Unanimous
Waiver of Landscape Standards Findings of Fact:
(1)
The carrying out of the strict letter of this UDO will result in practical
difficulties in the development of the property included in the petition;
(2)
Approval will observe the spirit of this UDO;
(3)
Approval will secure public safety and welfare;
(4)
Approval will provide substantial justice;
(5)
(a) there are exceptional conditions pertaining to the particular piece of
property in question because of its shape, size, or topography, that are not
applicable to other lands, buildings or structures in the same district, or (b)
there is a peculiar characteristic of a proposed use which makes the
application of certain development standards of this UDO, as requested in the
petition for variance of development standards, unrealistic;
(6)
Granting the variance requested will not confer upon the applicant any special
privileges that are denied to other owners or residents of the district in
which the property is located;
(7)
A literal interpretation of the provisions of this UDO would deprive the
applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other owners or residents of the
district in which the property is located;
(8)
The requested variance will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of this
UDO and will not be injurious to the neighborhood or to the general welfare;
(9)
The special circumstances giving rise to the variance request are not the
result of the actions of the applicant; and,
(10)
The variance requested is the minimum variance that will make possible the
legal use of the land, building, or structure.
Action
#5: Action on Landscape Waiver:
Having made and recorded its findings of fact, the Board approved a motion to
grant a Waiver of Regulations of UDO Section 7.01, Table 7.01‑C, to
approve the reduction of the B‑225 buffer to a B‑75 buffer along
major thoroughfares for Special Exception Use Petition #03‑SEU‑04
Motion
By: VanFossen
Second
By: Atwell
Vote:
Unanimous
Action #6: Findings
for Increase in Building Height: The
Board approved a motion to make and accept its findings of fact and direct the
Town Clerk to record the findings in the minutes for a waiver to allow a
maximum building height of 65 feet as submitted by McNeely and Associates,
Project Number: HSAHS/H5, dated Revised
Motion
By: VanFossen
Second
By: Atwell
Vote: Unanimous
(1)
The carrying out of the strict letter of this UDO will result in practical
difficulties in the development of the property included in the petition;
(2)
Approval will observe the spirit of this UDO;
(3)
Approval will secure public safety and welfare;
(4)
Approval will provide substantial justice;
(5)
(a) there are exceptional conditions pertaining to the particular piece of
property in question because of its shape, size, or topography, that are not
applicable to other lands, buildings or structures in the same district, or (b)
there is a peculiar characteristic of a proposed use which makes the
application of certain development standards of this UDO, as requested in the
petition for variance of development standards, unrealistic;
(6)
Granting the variance requested will not confer upon the applicant any special
privileges that are denied to other owners or residents of the district in which
the property is located;
(7)
A literal interpretation of the provisions of this UDO would deprive the
applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other owners or residents of the
district in which the property is located;
(8)
The requested variance will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of this
UDO and will not be injurious to the neighborhood or to the general welfare;
(9)
The special circumstances giving rise to the variance request are not the
result of the actions of the applicant; and,
(10)
The variance requested is the minimum variance that will make possible the
legal use of the land, building, or structure.
Motion
By: VanFossen
Second
By: Atwell
Vote:
Unanimous
Action
#7: Waiver of Building Height Standards:
Having made findings of fact that the Petition meets the requirements to be
granted a Waiver of Regulations of UDO Section 2.01, B., 7., maximum building
height, the Board approved a motion to approve the waiver to allow the maximum
building height of 65 feet as submitted by McNeely and Associates, Project
Number: HSAHS/H5, dated Revised October 27, 2003.
Motion
By: VanFossen
Second
By: Atwell
Vote:
Unanimous
Action #8: Findings
to Modify Gateway Architectural Requirements, Building Color: The
Board approved a motion to make and accept its findings of fact and direct the
Town Clerk to record the findings in the minutes for a waiver to allow the use
of more than three colors on building materials as submitted by McNeely and
Associates, Project Number: HSAHS/H5, dated Revised October 27, 2003.
Motion
By: VanFossen
Second
By: Dickson
Vote:
Unanimous
(1)
The proposed development represents the use of (building materials, colors,
textures, building architecture, roof features, façade modulation, building
orientation, signs, landscaping, lighting or open space) which will result in a
development pattern which is equivalent to or superior to that achievable under
the applicable regulations;
(2)
The proposed development will be compatible with and will enhance the use or
value of area properties;
(3)
The proposed development is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive
Plan; and,
(4)
The proposed development is consistent with the intent and purpose of this UDO.
In
Board discussion of the design of the building, it was noted that some of the
Board members felt the building’s design was ugly and would be dated.
The
opposing position was that it was a high school desperately needed and
long-awaited in
Action
#9: Waiver to Modify Gateway
Architectural Requirements -- Having made findings of fact that the
Petition meets the requirements to be granted a Waiver of Regulations of UDO
Section 3.01, C., 2., c., (1)., gateway architectural requirements, the Board
approved a motion to approve the waiver to allow for the use of more than three
colors on building materials as submitted by McNeely and Associates, Project
Number: HSAHS/H5, dated Revised October 27, 2003.
Motion By: VanFossen
Second
By: Womble
Vote:
The motion carried, following a 4-1 vote.
Commissioners Womble, Taylor, VanFossen and
Atwell voted for. Commissioner Dickson
voted against.
Action
#10: Findings of Fact to Modify Gateway
Lighting Requirements: The Board approved a motion to make and accept its
findings of fact and direct the Town Clerk to record the findings in the
minutes for a waiver to allow the use of a non‑white light source in a
Gateway Corridor as submitted by McNeely and Associates, PA, Project Number:
Project Number HSAHS/H5, dated Revised October 27, 2003.
Motion By: VanFossen
Second
By: Womble
Vote:
Unanimous
(1)
The carrying out of the strict letter of this UDO will result in practical
difficulties in the development of the property included in the petition;
(2)
Approval will observe the spirit of this UDO;
(3)
Approval will secure public safety and welfare;
(4)
Approval will provide substantial justice;
(5)
(a) there are exceptional conditions pertaining to the particular piece of
property in question because of its shape, size, or topography, that are not
applicable to other lands, buildings or structures in the same district, or (b)
there is a peculiar characteristic of a proposed use which makes the
application of certain development standards of this UDO, as requested in the
petition for variance of development standards, unrealistic;
(6)
Granting the variance requested will not confer upon the applicant any special
privileges that are denied to other owners or residents of the district in
which the property is located;
(7)
A literal interpretation of the provisions of this UDO would deprive the
applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other owners or residents of the district
in which the property is located;
(8)
The requested variance will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of this
UDO and will not be injurious to the neighborhood or to the general welfare;
(9)
The special circumstances giving rise to the variance request are not the
result of the actions of the applicant; and,
(10)
The variance requested is the minimum variance that will make possible the
legal use of the land, building, or structure.
Action
#11: Waiver of Gateway Lighting
Requirements: Having made findings of fact that the Petition meets the
requirements to be granted a Waiver of Regulations of UDO Section 7.02, A., 3.,
gateway lighting requirements, the Board approved a motion to grant a waiver to
allow the use of a non‑white light source in a Gateway Corridor as
submitted by McNeely and Associates, PA, Project Number: Project Number
HSAHS/H5, dated Revised October 27, 2003.
Motion
By: VanFossen
Second
By:
Vote:
Unanimous
Action
#12: Holly Springs High School Special
Exception Use: Having made findings of fact that the project meets the
requirements to be granted a Special Exception Use and having granted specific
waivers requested, the Board approved a motion to approve Special Exception Use
Petition #03‑SEU‑04, Holly Springs High School, to allow for the
development of a high school as submitted by McNeely and Associates Project
Number HSAHS/H5, dated Revised October 27, 2003 with the following conditions
recommended by staff and the Planning Board:
1. UDO Permit for
Sign Installation Petitions must be submitted to and approved by the Department
of Planning and Zoning prior to the installation of any signage, temporary or
permanent.
2. The Town is in
the process of trying to acquire funding from the State for widening of
3. The following
items are to be included on construction drawings (later in the approval
process):
a) Drainage area map for entire site and
the individual inlets.
b) Clarify if a hydrologic diversion from
the existing condition is being proposed.
c) A full drainage summary table will need
to be submitted that includes input and output of all calculations.
d) Around the perimeter of the fill slopes
drainage shall be discharged at the base of the slope.
e) Submit all hydrologic and hydraulic
calculations for stormwater detention areas.
f) Show detailed grading at the proposed
yard inlets to demonstrate how the 100‑year flow will be contained and
intercepted by the inlets without overtopping.
g) Evaluate the hydraulic grade line
through each of the systems.
h)
i) Indicate where roof drains will be daylighted.
j) Due to existing downstream concerns
please evaluate the post development
k) All TIA comments to be addressed during
construction drawing review.
l) Full plan and profile drawings to be
submitted for the intersection realignment/roadway improvements.
4. Approval is
granted for the maximum light level at the property line to be exceeded during
athletic events in accordance with the provisions of the UDO.
Motion By: VanFossen
Second By:
Vote: Unanimous
Copies of
the special exception use petition 03-SEU-04 and supporting documents submitted
into the record are incorporated into these minutes as addendum pages. A copy of the
8. Consent Agenda: All items on the
Consent Agenda were approved following a motion by Commissioner Dickson, a
second by Commissioner Atwell and a unanimous vote. The following actions were affected:
8a. Budget Amendments, $1,700 - The Board adopted amendments to the FY 2003‑04
budget in the amount of $1,700 to establish a travel allowance for Captain
Herring and to transfer a town vehicle to the engineering department. Copies
of the budget amendments are incorporated into these minutes as addendum pages.
8b. Budget Amendment, $68,050 -
The Board adopted a budget amendment to the FY 2003‑04 budget in the
amount of $68,088 to accept a North Carolina Governor’s Highway Safety Grant to
cover the cost for public safety personnel and equipment. A copy
of the budget amendment is incorporated into these minutes as an addendum page.
8c. Budget Amendments, $35,155 - The Board
adopted amendments to the FY 2003‑04 budget in the amount of $35,155 to
accept FEMA reimbursement funds for Hurricane Isabel expenditures. Copies of the budget amendments are
incorporated into these minutes as addendum pages.
8d. Budget Amendment, $7,300 - The Board adopted an amendment to the FY
2003‑04 budget in the amount of $7,300 to cover costs associated with the
police station security system and phone system. A copies of the budget amendment
is incorporated into these minutes as an addendum page.
8e. Fire Station Grading Contract
Change Order - The Board approved
change order #1 to the
8f. Clean Water Trust for
8g. Minutes
- The minutes of the Board’s regular meeting held on
At
this time, the Board approved a motion to recess for five minutes. In approximately five minutes, the Board
returned to open session. All members of
the Town Board were present, and a quorum was reestablished.
9a. FY 2002-2003
Audit Report – Mr. Holland
introduced Mark Stephens of Duke & Abbott, CPA's, P.A., who presented
results of the company’s audit of the Town’s finances for the year ending
A
copy of the Duke & Abbott management letter is incorporated into these
minutes as addendum pages.
9b. Resolution 03-30,
Remington Stream Restoration Project Grant Funds – Mrs. Keefer explained to the Board that on March 5, 2002 the
Town Board awarded a project to undertake the development of a drainage study
and a drainage improvements plan for the drainageway
that runs between Remington Subdivision and adjacent to the Holly Acres
subdivision, downstream of the Holly Springs Crossing Shopping Center. She said the scope of this project included
the exploration and retention of available funding sources for the project
however, it did not include construction costs or right‑of‑way
acquisition costs.
Ms. Keefer said that many things
have been accomplished since this project was approved by the Board. She said the engineering department is
currently reviewing the final draft of the drainage study for the Remington
Drainage Basin. She said the department
will be presenting this information to the residents of the drainage basin and
the Town Board after the first of the year.
In the spring of 2003, she said, engineering staff started the search
for financial assistance to undertake the necessary remediation methods to
resolve the drainage problem west of
She
said the Town has sent two grant applications in the spring and summer of 2003,
one to the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration project and the other to the
Clean Water Management Trust Fund. Ms.
Keefer said that in concurrence with the grant submittals project information
via brochures and meetings were made available to the residents adjacent to the
project. After receiving word from both
of the potential funding sources for the stream restoration project that the
Town would not be able to receive funding for the project in 2003, the Town
sent in another application to the Clean Water Management Trust Fund on
Ms. Keefer said that in order to
meet the
Action:
The Board approved a motion to adopt Resolution 03‑R‑30
requesting the State of
Motion
By: Dickson
Second
By: Atwell
Vote:
Unanimous
A copy of
Resolution 03-30 is incorporated into these minutes as addendum pages.
9c. Cobble Ridge Phase 03-MAS-04 Preliminary Plan - Ms. Daniel-Hobbs said that this request is for
development of a 4‑acre site located on
Ms. Hobbs said that a 20‑foot undisturbed
buffer that meets the A‑20 requirements of the UDO as an open buffer is
provided along the perimeter of the property.
Ms. Hobbs explained that water and
sewer service are available at the site.
She said the developer would be extending both within the site and would
stub to upstream properties. She said a fee‑in‑lieu of upgrade for
both a downstream pump station and the Middle Creek Interceptor are due for
this project.
Ms. Hobbs said that this site would
tie to an existing street stub within the Cobble Ridge development and also, it
proposes two (2) street stubs to adjacent undeveloped property. Ms.
Hobbs said that additional signage at the street stubs indicating that the
streets will be extended in the future will be required. She said this site does not have any stream
buffer requirements and a comprehensive drainage plan would be required with
first submittal of construction drawings.
She noted that staff and the planning board had reviewed the plans and
both recommend approval with conditions.
Action:
The Board approved a motion to approve Master Plan #03‑MAS‑04
for Cobble Ridge Phase 2 as submitted by Tony M. Tate Landscape Architecture,
dated Revised
1. Prior
to construction drawing approval, the following must be completed:
a. A preservation landscape plan with a tree
inventory for the 20’ A‑20 landscape buffer must be provided to and
approved by the Department of Planning & Zoning.
b. The property must be annexed into the Town limits.
c. A fee‑in‑lieu for upgrade of the
downstream pump station must be paid.
d. A fee‑in‑lieu for the Middle
Creek Interceptor must be paid.
e. A fee‑in‑lieu for the portion of
the street stub that will not be constructed must be paid.
2. A
fee‑in‑lieu of land dedication will be due at final plat approval
stage.
3. The following items are to be included
on construction drawings (later in the approval process):
a. Comprehensive drainage plan including all
calculations.
Motion
By: Womble
Second
By: Dickson
Vote:
Unanimous
9d. Appointments to
the Board of Adjustments and Planning Board
- Ms. Bobber said that currently
For the Board of Adjustment, Ms.
Bobber noted that three in-town members and one in-town alternate need to be
appointed. An alternate, she said, is a
member who is welcomed to attend all meetings of the Board of Adjustment, but
who is only seated if he or she is needed.
Ms. Bobber noted that the current
three in-town members whose terms expire all are seeking reappointment: James Cobb, Lesli Doares and Cynthia Gibbons.
She added that the current in-town alternate member, Linda
Hunt-Williams, did not apply for reappointment.
Action: After making nominations, the Board selected
the four top applicants receiving nominations: Stuart Wilder Allen, 412
Gooseberry Drive, in-town member; James Cobb, 4936 Sunset Forest Circle,
in-town member; Otis Byrd, 705 S. Main Street, in-town member; and John Miller,
101 Kenmont Drive, in-town alternate member to serve
on the Holly Springs Board of Adjustment from Jan. 1, 2004 to Dec. 31, 2006.
Motion
By: Atwell
Second
By: Womble
Vote: Unanimous
For the Planning Board, Ms. Bobber
noted that three in-town members and one member representing the Town’s
extraterritorial jurisdiction need to be appointed; however, she noted that the
Town did not receive any applications from residents of the ETJ. Therefore, she asked that the Town Board
appoint three in-town members now and that she would attempt to recruit
applicants from the Town’s ETJ for future consideration.
Ms. Bobber noted that two currently
seated in-town Planning Board members, Lisa Martin and Jonathan Gibbons, have
applied for reappointment. The third
seat is a vacant one once held by Commissioner Taylor.
Action: After making nominations, the Board selected
the three top applicants receiving nominations:
Vinnie DeBenedetto,
4445 Lake Flower Drive, in-town member to fulfill the unexpired term of former
member Mike Taylor (Dec. 31, 2005); and Joe Signoretti,
1220 Trotters Bluff Drive and Raymond Cordon, 4813 Sunset Forest Circle, to
serve on the Holly Springs Planning Board from Jan. 1, 2004 to Dec. 31, 2006.
In making nominations, Commissioner Womble said he wanted to talk about the nomination process
at the Board’s winter retreat. He said
after hearing the unanimous nominations of his four fellow board members, his
nominations were pointless. He said he
nevertheless was nominating applicants George Kimble, Danny Bronson and Vincent
D’Agostino.
Motion
By: Atwell
Second
By: Dickson
Vote: The motion followed a 4-1 vote. Commissioners Taylor, VanFossen, Atwell and
Dickson voted for. Commissioner Womble voted against.
10. Public Comment: At this time, an opportunity was provided for members of
the audience who had registered to speak to address the Board on any variety of
topics not listed on the night’s agenda.
The following citizens were heard: None
11. Other
Business: Commissioner Atwell requested that the Board be provided
with a map
illustrating
existing and approved housing stock in
12. Manager’s
Reports: Mr. Dean reported
that the 2004 Town of Holly Springs calendar is
out; that Town Board
members have been assigned ncmail email accounts for
their convenience; that the Town has received approval of $400,000 in NCDOT
funds for the extension of
Action: The Board authorized, by consensus, staff to
begin negotiations with the Mulkey Engineering firm
for design work for Ballentine Street Extended and
for the final contract to be brought back to the Board for consideration.
Mr. Dean then asked the Board to
agree on dates for the 2004 Winter Retreat.
The Board agreed on Friday through
13. Closed Session: None.
14. Adjournment ‑ There being no further business for the evening,
the Dec. 16, 2003 meeting of the Holly Springs Board of Commissioners was
adjourned following a motion by Commissioner Dickson, a second by Commissioner
Atwell and a unanimous vote.
Respectfully
Submitted on
_________________________________
Joni Powell, CMC
Town Clerk
Addendum pages as
referenced in these minutes follow and are a part of the official record.