Town of Holly Springs

Board of Commissioners Regular Meeting

Tuesday, June 4, 2002

MINUTES

 

The Holly Springs Town Board of Commissioners met in regular session on Tuesday, June 4, 2002 in the cafeteria of the W. E. Hunt Community Center, located at 301 Stinson Ave.  Mayor Dick Sears presided, calling the meeting to order at 7 p.m.  A quorum was established as the mayor and all five board members were present as the meeting opened.

 

Board Members Present:  Commissioners Steve Tedder, John Schifano, Chet VanFossen, Peter Atwell, and Hank Dickson and Mayor Sears.

 

Board Members Absent: None.

 

Staff Members Present: Carl G. Dean, town manager; Chuck Simmons, assistant town manager; Ernest C. Pearson, town attorney; Joni Powell, town clerk (recording the minutes); Linda Harper, deputy town clerk; Gina Bobber, planning director; Drew Holland, finance director; Len Bradley, director of parks and recreation; Kendra Thompson, town engineer; Stephanie Sudano, director of engineering; Luncie McNeil, director of public works; Cecil Parker, chief of public safety; Alysia Bailey, town planner; and Jennifer Mizelle, director of economic development.

 

2 and 3.  The pledge of allegiance was recited, and the meeting opened with an invocation by Rev. Gary Allred, pastor of the Sunrise Methodist Church.

 

4.  Agenda Adjustment - The June 4, 2002 meeting agenda was adopted with changes, if any, as listed below.

            Motion By: Atwell

            Second By: Dickson

            Vote: Unanimous.

            Items Added to Agenda: None

            Consent Agenda Items Removed: Items 6a, 6e. and 6f.

            Other Changes: That items 6a., 6e., and 6f. were to be heard before item 7. Unfinished Business.

                                   

            At this time, the Mayor recognized Mr. Bill Pinkus, who reported on the sale of the Children’s Miracle Network house in Holly Glen.  A check for $110,000 was presented to The Duke’s Children Miracle Network.  He said he hopes to make this an annual fund-raising project.

            The Town Board applauded the efforts of Mr. Pinkus and his company’s efforts.

            No Action. 

 

 5. Public Hearing: New Town Hall Finance Proposal Resolution 02‑R‑18 ‑ Mr. Holland explained that the resolution sets up a framework in which the Town Board makes finding of fact as required by General Statute and then authorizes the filing of an application to the Local Government Commission for approval of a financing agreement for the construction of the new town hall.  Mr. Holland said first, a public hearing should be held to give citizens an opportunity to comment on the proposed financing of an amount not to exceed $3.8 million for the project.

            With that explanation completed, Mayor Sears opened the public hearing to accept public comments.  The following comments were received: None.

            There being no comments, the public hearing was closed.

            Action:  The Board approved a motion to adopt Resolution 02‑R‑18 authorizing the filing of an application with the Local Government Commission for approval of a financing agreement authorized by North Carolina G.S. 160A-20.

            Motion By: Atwell

            Second By: Tedder

            Vote:  Unanimous

            A copy of Resolution 02‑R‑18 are incorporated into these minutes as addendum pages.

           

            Before action on the remaining items on the Consent Agenda, there was discussion about item No. 6h.  Commissioner Schifano asked how the Town ascertained the history of zoning actions.

            Ms. Bobber explained that she took the earliest known zoning map and then staff researched town minutes for rezoning and annexation submittals to the town.  Commissioner Schifano asked if staff had any problems finding the information needed for the research.  Ms. Bobber said the older Town Board minutes did not give much explanation on the petitions but enough to complete the research.

 

6a.  Consent Agenda - All remaining items on the Consent Agenda were approved following a motion by Commissioner Dickson, a second by Commissioner Atwell and a unanimous vote.  The following actions were affected:

            6a.  Removed at Agenda Adjustment.

            6b.  Budget Amendment, $80,000  ‑ The Board adopted a budget amendment to the FY 2001‑02 budget in the amount of $80,000 to set up a Project Fund for Ballentine Street right of way and design.  A copy of the budget amendment is incorporated into these minutes as addendum pages.

            6c. Budget Amendment, $16,500 – The Board adopted a budget amendment to the FY 2001‑02 budget in the amount of $16,500 to purchase a 2000 F‑350 truck for the Parks and Recreation Department.   A copy of the budget amendment is incorporated into these minutes as an addendum page.

            6d. Ballentine Street Temporary Street Closing – The Board approved authorization for the Chief of Public Safety to order temporary closing of a portion of Ballentine Street for the duration of the construction of the new Town Hall.

            6e.  Removed at Agenda Adjustment.

            6f.   Removed at Agenda Adjustment.

            6g. Minutes ‑ Minutes of the Board’s budget workshop held on May 13, 2002 were approved. 

            6h. Town Official Zoning Map  ‑ The Board ratified the current Town of Holly Springs Official Zoning map, per recommendation of the Planning Board and staff. 

 

            At this time, the Mayor proposed that the Town Board take up the items that were removed from the Consent Agenda.

 

6a.  Late Fee Policy Statement P‑014  ‑ Commissioner Dickson said he asked that this item be removed from the Consent Agenda because he intended to voted against it.  He said he did not want to adopt a policy that would reward bad behavior.

            Mr. Holland explained that the policy was devised, using that of Tarboro as a guide.  The policy allows the Town’s finance director and designees to remove a late charge from a water bill customer who: requests it in writing and who has not had a late payment within the last 12 months. 

            Action: The Board approved a motion to adopt Policy Statement No. 014, authorizing Waiver of Late Fee on Eligible Water Bills.

            Motion By: Schifano

            Second By: Tedder

            Vote: The motion carried, 5-1.  Commissioner Dickson voted against.

            A copy of Town policy statement P‑014 is incorporated into these minutes as addendum pages.

 

6e. Braxton Village, Phase 5 & 6, 02‑MAS‑01  ‑ Ms. Bailey explained the minimum lot size for this portion of the subdivision is 7,250 square feet.  The plan as submitted conforms to the standards set forth in the Town’s Zoning Ordinance.  There is a 20’ semi‑opaque undisturbed buffer around the perimeter of the site, and as specified in the PUD document and noted on the Preliminary Plans, the existing trees will be preserved to serve as street trees and where existing trees cannot be used, trees will be planted according to town standards.

            Ms. Bailey said this phase has a street stub from an existing phase, but will be required to provide secondary access as discussed during the original PUD approval.  There are plans in the review process that would allow for this, but the Town cannot guarantee the schedule of the adjacent developments. 

            Ms. Bailey said staff and Planning Board recommends to approve the Preliminary Plan 02‑MAS‑01 for Braxton Village Phases 5 and 6, as submitted by Blackburn Consulting Engineering, with the conditions.

            Commissioner Atwell said the single access into and out of Braxton Village off Avent Ferry Road concerned him.

            Mrs. Sudano explained a staff condition is that simultaneous development of neighboring subdivisions with road connections that would provide inter-connectivity and internal circulation.

            Commissioner Atwell said he is still concerned that Avent Ferry Road is being over-burdened with continual residential development.  He said he wanted to go on record that he feels that another street, perhaps an east-west collector be suggested to handle the additional traffic.

            Mrs. Sudano said on the regional Thoroughfare Plan submitted to CAMPO, the Town has identified an area that should be considered as a north-south corridor, but it is a long-range future plan.

            Commissioner Schifano said he was concerned about density.  He suggested that the Town keep in mind that a lot of property is included in total acreage that is not useable property, including roadways, wetlands, open space.  He said he would like to see both numbers provided to the Town Board.

            Commissioner Tedder and VanFossen agreed.

            Action: The Board approved a motion to approve the Preliminary Plan 02‑MAS‑01 for Braxton Village Phases 5 and 6, as submitted by Blackburn Consulting Engineering, with the following conditions:

            1. All open space fees must be paid prior to final plat approval.

            2. Construction drawing approval is required before construction may begin.

            3. The following items are to be included on construction drawings (later in the approval process):     

                        * The development of this site is dependent on simultaneous construction of water main and roadway on adjacent parcels to provide interconnectivity and redundancy of transportation and utilities.   Plans for these connections should be submitted with the 1st submittal of construction drawings

            Motion By: Tedder

            Second By: VanFossen

            Vote: Unanimous

 

            6f. Arbor Commons Subdivision, 02‑MAS‑06 – Ms. Bailey explained that this proposal is for the approval of a new subdivision consisting of 10 single‑family residential lots with a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet.  The project site is located off of Commons Drive, adjacent to the Arbor Creek PUD.

            Ms. Bailey said that staff and the Planning Board recommend approval of Major Subdivision Preliminary Plan #02‑MAS‑06 Arbor Commons, as submitted by Spaulding and Norris, Project Number 366‑02, dated Revised 5/13/02 with conditions.

            Commissioner Atwell said he wanted to revive discussion of the Town’s sewer capacity and the Tischler study.

            Commissioner Tedder said this 10-lot project would probably not have a significant impact on the Town’s sewer capacity.

            Commissioner Schifano said he was pleased that the project had 10,000 square foot lots.

            Commissioner VanFossen pointed out that approved master plans are a bit different than new submittals in this area of concern.  He said he felt the Town Board should keep sewer capacity and density in mind for new submittals.

            Commissioner Atwell suggested that the Board meet prior to adoption of the UDO to consider amendments to the PUD or Master Plan ordinances concerning total acreage calculations regarding useable property, wetlands, roadways, etc.

            Commissioner VanFossen agreed with Commissioner Atwell that the Town should come up with some guidelines to calculate total useable property.

            Mr. Dean agreed with the Board.  He said it would be helpful if staff knows early in the plan review process exactly what the Board’s vision of quality development is so that they can help developers bring to the Board plans that would be acceptable.

            Action: The Board approved a motion to approve the major subdivision Preliminary Plan #02‑MAS‑06 Arbor Commons, as submitted by Spaulding and Norris, with the following conditions:

            1. A fee‑in‑lieu of park land dedication at a rate of $800 per lot is required to be paid at time of platting.

            2. Construction drawings must be submitted and approved prior to construction beginning.

            3. The following items are to be included on construction drawings (later in the approval process):

                A.     The following fees will apply to this project:

                        * Fee‑in‑lieu for downstream Middle Creek pump station upgrade

                        * Fee‑in‑lieu for Middle Creek outfall

                        * Transportation fee‑in‑lieu for Middle Creek Bridge

            Motion By:  Atwell

            Second By:  Tedder

            Vote: Unanimous.

 

7.  Bible Way Extension Right of Way – Mrs. Sudano explained to the Board that several months ago, staff presented information on Bible Way and its proposed connection from Wescott Subdivision to Optimist Farm Road.  The Bible Way roadway and utility connection is one that has been under discussion and anticipated for quite some time, beginning several years ago with residents who live in the immediate vicinity of, and on, Bible Way ‑ in connection with the planned Town‑funded Fair Share Project.

            Secondly, Mrs. Sudano said, the topic arose again about a year and a half ago when the Town negotiated and approved a developer agreement with an adjacent developer.  The developer agreement included the installation of a roadway and utility improvements along Bible Way as a requirement of the subdivision development plan.   The goal of the developer agreement was two-fold, Mrs. Sudano said:  to meet a need for utility extensions in this area that had been identified during the planning of the Fair Share Project, and to meet utility and transportation network needs for the newly‑approved Town‑approved subdivision.

            Mrs. Sudano explained that since Board packets were distributed, two of the 10 subject property owners had come forth and agreed to the proposed easement agreement along Bible Way Court, including Ms.Mary Matthews who is planning to build in the future and one other adjacent property owner.

            Mrs. Sudano provided the following history of this topic in Town Board agenda packets prior to the meeting:

            1.  The Bible Way roadway connection is a recommended transportation improvement by Engineering, Public Safety, Public Works, Public Utility, and Planning Directors.  The connection meets the Town's goals for interconnectivity of roadways and pedestrian facilities, which is a consideration for every subdivision plan that is approved by the Town.  It also provides critical public safety redundancy for transportation and utility (water) connections.  In addition, there is a need for this roadway connection to be installed as early as possible to provide a transportation connection to Optimist Farm Road, to relieve additional traffic pressure that would otherwise occur on Sunset Lake Road as new Town residents from this subdivision travel to nearby schools and other facilities.

            2.  The Town has already entered into a developer agreement with the developer of the adjacent subdivision that fully funds the costs associate with the water, sewer, and transportation improvements along Bible Way.  The improvements would not require out‑of‑pocket funding and budgeting from the Town.

            3.  The installation of utilities and transportation improvements along Bible Way is consistent with the original plan for the Fair Share project.  Bible Way was, in fact, included in the original Fair Share area targeted for water and sewer improvements by the Town.  It was removed from the Fair Share project because funding was not available at that time.

            4.  The Town Attorney has reviewed the condemnation that would be required and confirmed that the Town has the authority to utilize condemnation for this project.

            5.  There are 10 property owners from which public right of way would be necessary for improvements to occur.  To date, two of those property owners have dedicated the right of way.  The property dedicated constitutes approximately 20% of the frontage along Bible Way that is required.

             6.  A 120' private roadway easement exists on all 10 properties, in the same approximate location of the 60’ public right of way and temporary construction easement that would be required for this project.

            7.  The Town has offered in the past to provide water and sewer connections to the properties along the roadway under the same terms as the other properties in the Fair Share area (waiving of connection fees in the estimated amount of $6000 to $8000 per property).

            8. The Town staff and the developer have verbally committed to work with the residents to make any adjustments possible to address concerns of the two residents currently living along Bible Way.

            9. Roadway and utility improvements along Bible Way will open up significant and strategic undeveloped and unincorporated properties to the north and east for possible incorporation into the Town limits at a future date. 

            10. Approximately one and one‑half years ago, the Town spent in the neighborhood of $40,000 on a Fair Share change order to extend a waterline from the Fair Share project eastward to stub out to Bible Way in anticipation of the Bible Way waterline connection.

            11. History of Right of Way Acquisition:

a. by the Town:

            i.          Initial letter to enter properties for surveying  9/2000

            ii.          Town’s subcontractor‑initiated acquisition 8/2001

iii.         Town’s subcontractor reported 5 no’s, 1 yes, 2 no response’s, and 2 unable to contact – in 9/2001

b.  by the developer:

i.          See attached chronology outlined in 2/5/2002 letter titled “Sunset Ransdell Ventures LLC” (notes added by staff for clarifications, and a copy of the original developer agreement is attached for your reference)

ii.          Subsequent to the 2/5/2002 letter, the developer has sent certified letters (see attachments) to the adjacent landowners, and met last week with the one who responded to the letter.  At this meeting, I was present as the Town’s representative, and two additional landowners were present.  This meeting did not result in additional ROW acquisitions.  However, one of the commissioners has requested that I list the items of concern that were discussed, along with any actions that can be taken in an attempt to address them, in this report for consideration:

1. speeds – if the roadway qualifies with Town standards, speed control tables could be added;

2.  traffic – roadway can be signed for “No Trucks”, and could be kept closed until after some portion of construction is completed (the developer is concerned about having this requirement established);

3. roadway name – developer could be asked to maintain the name Bible Way;

4.  privacy – tree clearing could be minimized as much as possible during construction

5.  aesthetics – street will be paved and curb and guttered (31’ back to back) with sidewalk on one side;

6. Wescott Subdivision signage – developer agrees not to install subdivision signage at Optimist Farm Road intersection with Bible Way.

                                    7. No though trucks.  (No construction trucks).

 

            Mrs. Sudano requested the authorization to proceed with condemnation of public right of way along the proposed Bible Way extension. 

            At this time, the Mayor yielded the floor to residents of Bible Way who have concerns.

            Donald C. O’Neal of 4121 Bible Way Ct – Mr. O’Neal pointed out to the Board that only a few people actually live on Bible Way.  He questioned how the Town could take a private roadway and make it public, especially when the property is not within the jurisdiction of the Town.  He said he is concerned because he is happy with the way it is.  Also, his livelihood depends on dump trucks, and he feels the “No Through Trucks” would prevent him from being able to drive his truck home.

            Mr. O’Neal said he speaks for residents who live there and feels Bible Way will become a heavily-traveled road, to which they are opposed.  He added that he does not relish having to connect to Town utility services, due to the expense.

            Mr. Pearson, Town Attorney – Mr. Pearson addressed some of Mr. O’Neal’s questions.  He explained that law provides for the condemnation by a municipality of any property for a public purpose, regardless in what jurisdiction the land is located.  He explained that the Town could acquire the right of way because a roadway is a public purpose.  He explained that the formula questions are: is the right of way for the use of the public and does the public benefit from it.  Legally, he said, this would be an appropriate taking.  Personal issues faced by individual property owners would be a policy matter, he added.

            William Jones, 4148 Bible Way Ct. – Mr. Jones pointed out that past minutes of the Town Board (dated September 2001) state that the Board approved a motion for water lines only to be installed along Bible Way and that other improvements would not be done.  He feels the Town is taking his right of way and his rural way of life.  He added that he feels it is not fair that the Board can change its mind.  He feels property owners in this area are being abused.

            Addressing Mr. O’Neal’s concerns, Commissioner VanFossen asked about the “No Trucks” signs that were mentioned in the topic history.

            Mrs. Sudano said “No Through-Trucks,” are actually being recommended, and that the signs would be erected only on Bible Way so as to protect residents there from heavy construction traffic.  Mr. O’Neal, she said, would not be prohibited since his traffic is local to Bible Way.

            Commissioner VanFossen asked about who would maintain Bible Way Court.  Mrs. Sudano said the Town would be responsible for maintenance.

            In addressing the issue of the Board’s September action, Mrs. Sudano said that, after that meeting, a desire was stated to continue pursuit of right of way by one of the property owners on Bible Way.

            Commissioner Atwell clarified that, in September, he was coming from a water supply standpoint when the Board took action.  He said he voted to extend the water lines along Bible Way but to not require the residents to hook on to the service.

            Mr. O’Neal said he did not want town water.

            Commissioner Dickson, Mrs. Sudano and Mr. Pearson assured Mr. Jones that outside the town limits, he would not be forced to connect to services.  Only upon a request for voluntary annexation, would a property owner be required to connect.

            Mrs. Sudano added that the use of ductile iron pipe would eliminate the need for residents along Bible Way to abandon their private wells because of their proximity to the sewer line.  Also, she added, the sewer line could be pushed to other side of roadway so that the residents would not have to worry about well problems.  She said another option is that the Town could move the wells at the Town’s expense.

            Mayor Sears explained to citizens present that things have to be done for the good of the Town and that some of these things may negatively impact some property owners.  He said he, the Board and staff want to see how much the Town can do to help make sure the Town does the best it can with as little impact as possible.

            Patricia Jones, 229 Mendenhall Drive, Winston-Salem, NC, property owner  – Mrs. Jones asked again about the September action.

            Commissioner Schifano said he was troubled by the decision, but that this kind of thing is what towns do:  from time to time, (towns) take private property to build public infrastructure.

            Mrs. Jones asked the Board to please reconsider the condemning of right of way along Bible Way Court.

            Mayor Sears said that the Board tries to listen to the public’s concerns and think about what could be done to minimize the impact, but that a decision has to be made.  As the town grows, he said, a lot more of this will occur.

            Chief Parker addressed public safety issues raised by the residents.  He said that the Holly Springs Department of Public Safety would patrol the public areas (roadway) of Bible Court to include speed violations.  He added, however, the dispatch for fire and rescue would remain as it was (Wake County response) currently for that area until a property owner chooses to request annexation. 

            Mayor Sears asked the citizens present and who lived on Bible Way Court what would it take to make them comfortable with the Town’s proposal.

            One of the residents replied to relocate the connecting road somewhere else.  This option, Mrs. Sudano said, has not been pursued simply because the existing roadbed is in place.

            Another suggestion was regulations to prohibit through-trucks on Bible Way.

            Action #1: The Board approved a motion to authorize staff to proceed with condemnation of public right of way along the proposed Bible Way extension. 

            Motion By: Schifano

            Second By: Dickson

            Vote:   Unanimous

 

            Commissioner Schifano suggested that a new motion be floored to include addendums suggested by Commissioner Tedder.  Commissioner Tedder suggested that the Town not install “No Trucks” signs because it is not an issue.  He then listed conditions he recommended be added to the motion.

 

            Action #2: The Board approved a motion to rescind and reconsider Commissioner Schifano’s original motion and the resulting vote so that an alternate motion could be considered.

            Motion By: Schifano

            Second By: Dickson

            Vote: Unanimous

 

            Action #3: The Board approved a motion to authorize staff to proceed with condemnation of public right of way along the proposed Bible Way extension with the following conditions: that no truck restrictions be placed on Bible Way; that existing resident property owners are to be assured they will not be compelled to connect to the Town water and sewer services as long as they are located outside the Town limits; that if existing resident property owners who have wells are compelled to connect to Town utility services in the future following voluntary or forced annexation, the Town will waive all utility connection fees (for Mr. Donald O’Neal at 4121 Bible Way Ct. and Mr. William Jones at 4148 Bible Way Ct.); if, during construction of the infrastructure, the need for well abandonment is determined, then the developer will bear the cost of installing ductile iron pipe or relocating the line to the opposite side of Bible Way or the Town the cost of relocating one or both of the existing wells, whichever option is mutually better for the Town and the residents.

            Motion By: Tedder

            Second By: Atwell

            Vote:  Unanimous

            Mayor Sears then suggested that a meeting be held with the two residents who live on Bible Way so that this project proceeds with as little negative impact to the residents as possible.

 

8a. Town Hall Bid Summary Acknowledgment   Mr. Simmons addressed the Board with a summary of bid openings for construction of the new Holly Springs Town Hall facility.  Mr. Simmons said there were 12 contractors from across the state who indicated interest the project.

            It appears, he reported, that the low bidder is Duke Construction Company of Morrisville.  Mr. Simmons said that references would be researched before staff makes a recommendation of award of the construction bid at a future Town Board meeting.  

            No action taken.

 

8b.  FY 2002‑03 Budget Ordinance 02‑07 and 02‑08 - Mr. Dean presented the budget ordinance for the FY 2002‑03 for the Board’s consideration.  This budget takes into account the comments received at the Board’s budget work session and at the budget public hearing held on May 21.  

            Action#1: The Board approved a motion to adopt Ordinance 02‑07, the budget ordinance adopting the FY 2002‑03 operating budget.

            Motion By: Atwell

            Second By: VanFossen

            Vote: Unanimous

            A copy of Ordinance 02-07 is incorporated into these minutes as addendum pages.

 

            Action#2: The Board approved a motion to adopt Ordinance 02‑08, an ordinance setting utility rates and fees for the 2002-03 fiscal year.

            Motion By: Atwell

            Second By: Dickson

            Vote: Unanimous

            A copy of Ordinance 02-08 is incorporated into these minutes as addendum pages

 

8c.  Dog Park Property Leasing  ‑ Mr. Bradley addressed the Board pointing out that the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee recommended adoption of the Jones Park Master Plan without inclusion of a dog park, but also that the Town investigate possible properties and possible joint ventures for an off-leash dog park in some other location.

            Mr. Bradley explained that a few weeks ago, the Town was approached by the Moravian Church with a verbal proposal that the Town lease a portion of the church property located on Holly Springs Road for use as soccer fields.

            Mr. Bradley said he made a inspection of the site and then called the Moravian Church representative back to ask if it would be possible to also use some of the space for a dog park.  Mr. Bradley said that since it would be temporary, it might be a good location to have a pilot program dog park.  Estimated cost of the dog park would be about $20,000, Mr. Bradley said, for the one- to two-acre site.

            Mr. Bradley asked the Board if leasing the Moravian Church property would be an option or does the Town need to look for other options.

            Board members agreed that they would prefer another location, and they stressed that financial participation by private groups and/or individuals was desirable.

            Mayor Sears suggested that the Town look for a couple of other locations, including acres located in existing parks; that funding sources be identified; and that a report be made to the Board within 60-90 days (by the first meeting in September) for further discussion and possible action.

            No action was taken. 

 

8d.  Hazard Mitigation Plan  ‑ Mrs. Thompson said that as a result of Senate Bill 300, the State is requiring that local governments have an approved Hazard Mitigation Plan in place in order to receive State disaster relief funds ‑ after August 1, 2002 ‑  for any State-declared disaster. Wake County took the initiative to design a county wide plan in conjunction with the municipalities in Wake County, Mrs. Thompson said.  Each individual town will adopt the county plan and add the required additional town‑specific items, she added.

            The Wooten Company was awarded the contract for Wake County's plan and has provided each of the municipalities with a proposal to complete the two required town‑specific components of the plan.  Mrs. Thompson said the plan is due in August, so work needs to begin now to meet the submittal deadlines.

            Action: The Board approved a motion to enter an agreement with The Wooten Company to complete the Town’s portion of the Wake County Hazard Mitigation Plan. 

            Motion By: Tedder

            Second By: Atwell

            Vote: Unanimous

            A copy of the agreement with The Wooten Company is incorporated into these minutes as addendum pages.

 

8e.  Cedar Queen Development, LLC, Developer Agreement Amendment ‑ Mrs. Sudano said last fall the Town Board approved a developer agreement with Cedar Queen Development LLC.  The agreement was to secure sewer and water capacity in exchange for posting of a Letter of Credit for the value of all water and sewer capacity fees.  One condition outlined in the agreement was that the LOC must be posted on or before June 2, 2002.  Mrs. Sudano said that she had spoke with the developer and received a letter requesting for an extension of that date.

            Action: The Board approved a motion to amend the original approved Developer’s Agreement with Cedar Queen Development, LLC to extend submittal date of the Letter of Credit until December 2, 2002.

            Motion By: Schifano

            Second By: Atwell

            Vote: Unanimous

 

8f. Sunset Ridge Flood Study Addendum to The Rose Group Contract – Mrs. Sudano explained to the Board that the preliminary results from the Sunset Ridge Flood Study approved by the Town Board last winter indicate the need for additional field work to confirm the viability of one of the alternatives investigated for reducing downstream flooding.  Mrs. Sudano said the proposal is for additional funding in the amount of $3,000 to cover those additional services for field surveying.

            Mrs. Sudano said that once the proposal is approved, the consultant has committed to having a final report and recommendations in July. 

            Action: The Board approved a motion to approve an addendum to the professional services contract with the Rose Group in the amount of $3,000.00 to cover additional services.

            Motion By: Tedder

            Second By: Schifano

            Vote: Unanimous

            A copy of the addendum to The Rose Group contract for professional services is incorporated into these minutes as addendum pages.

 

9.  Public Comment - At this time, an opportunity was provided for members of the audience who had registered to speak to address the Board on any variety of topics not listed on the night’s agenda.  The following citizens were heard:

            Kathryn Sheldon, 204 Texanna Way,  - Mrs. Sheldon said that she was concern with the completion of her phase in Braxton Village.  Mrs. Sheldon said that she has had problems with the construction workers stealing water and electricity from her and her neighbors and the abandoned equipment that was being stored on a vacant lot.

            Kyle Kornbauw of 204 Texanna Way – Mr. Kornbauw said his concern is that Phases 5 and 6 were just approved by the Town and the current phase is not yet completed.  He said he is concerned about the undevelopment of roads and infrastructure at this point.  He also noted the abandoned construction equipment.

            Mayor Sears asked Town staff to investigate the storage of the disabled equipment and that the chief of public safety send the appropriate letters to the developer and/or builders advising them that theft of a utility is a misdemeanor and will be prosecuted.

 

10.  Other Business - The Board approved a motion to excuse Commissioner Peter Atwell from attending the next three Town Board meetings (June 18, July 2 and July 16, 2002).

            Motion By: Schifano

            Second By: VanFossen

            Vote: Unanimous

 

11.  Manager’s Reports - Mr. Dean reported that the road resurfacing program is underway; that the bandshell and picnic shelter at Womble Park will be completed by the end of June; and he encouraged Board Members to attend Town Hall Day June 11, 2002 in Raleigh.

 

12.  Closed Session - None.

 

13.  Adjournment - There being no further business for the evening, the June 4, 2002 meeting of the Holly Springs Board of Commissioners was adjourned following a motion by Commissioner Schifano, a second by Commissioner Atwell and a unanimous vote.

 

 

Respectfully Submitted on Tuesday, July 2, 2002.

 

 

 

____________________ _____

Joni Powell, CMC, Town Clerk

Addendum pages as referenced in these minutes follow and are a part of the official record.