Town of
Board of Commissioners Regular Meeting
MINUTES
The Holly Springs Town Board of Commissioners met in regular
session on
Board
Members Present: Commissioners
Board Members Absent:
None.
Staff Members
Present:
2
and 3. The pledge of
allegiance was recited, and the meeting opened with an invocation by Rev. Sam
Gore of Salt and
4. Agenda Adjustment: The
Motion By: Dickson
Second By: Atwell
Vote: Unanimous.
Items Added to the Agenda: None.
Consent Agenda Items Removed: 8b. 2004-05 Town of
Other Changes: Items 9 and10b
were removed from New Business to be considered at the
5a. National Day of Prayer – Mayor
Pro-tem Dickson presented a proclamation to Amy Ragsdale designating
Ms. Ragsdale, who is chair of the Holly Springs Day of
Prayer observance, invited the Board and public to join the festivities on May 6th
at
Action: None.
5b. Kids
Appreciation Day - Mayor Sears presented a proclamation to Rene’ Moody
and Alex Guess of the Kiwanis Club of
Holly Springs, Lesli Doares
of the Assets Build Character and the Mayor’s Youth Advisory Board. Mayor Pro-tem Dickson read the proclamation to
designate
Ms. Rene’ Moody addressed her
appreciation and announced that there will be ice cream for the kids at
Action: None.
6a. Public Hearing: Annexation Petition A04‑05, Sunset
Ridge North, Phase 5A property - Ms. Bailey explained to the Board that the
Town had received three petitions from multiple property owners for voluntary
annexation of land containing 56.5606 acres located with the Sunset Ridge
North, II, Phase 5A subdivision. Ms.
Bailey said that the petition meets all the statutory requirements for
annexation.
With that explanation completed,
Mayor Sears opened the public hearing to accept input. The following comments were recorded: None.
There being no comments, the public
hearing was closed.
Action: The Board approved a motion to adopt Annexation Ordinance
A04‑05 annexing 56.5606 acres owned by: Sunset Forest, LLC, Doris P.
Jones, ET.Al; Helton Homes, Inc.; DJF Builders, Inc.;
Barnes Builders & Realty; Future Homes; WHG, Inc.; Colanco
Co.; J. Scott Builders; Charles D. Saik and Jerry and
Melissa Gulyes into the corporate limits of the Town
of Holly Springs.
Motion By: Atwell
Second By: Dickson
Vote: Unanimous
A copy of Annexation Ordinance A04-05 is
incorporated into these minutes as addendum pages.
6b. Public
Hearing: Town’s Charter Amendment – Mr.
Schifano explained that the Board is proposing
to amend the Town Charter to a Council membership structure for the governing
body, replacing the Board of Commissioners style. He said at the April 20, 2004 Town Board
meeting the board approved a resolution of intent to consider the Charter
amendment by ordinance and set a public hearing for tonight. Mr. Schifano said the Board is to hold the
public hearing and adopt a proposed ordinance making the amendment at the May
18th Town Board meeting.
With that explanation completed,
Mayor Sears opened the public hearing to accept input. The following comments were recorded: None.
There being no comments, the public
hearing was closed.
Action: None.
6c. Public Hearing: FY 2004-05 Pre-Budget - Mr. Holland said
this public hearing is to receive input from the public and to set a date for
the Board to hold a public hearing on the final proposed FY 2004-05 budget plan
prior to its adoption sometime in June.
Mr. Holland suggested setting June 1, 2004 for a public hearing,
followed by adoption of the budget that evening or the June 15th
Board meeting.
With that explanation completed,
Mayor Sears opened the public hearing to accept input. The following comments were recorded:
Kathy Hamilton Brown of 324 Hallwood Court, a member of the
Page Pavlik
of 220 Dutchhill Road asked the Board to consider allocating
funds in the FY 2004-05 budget to install sidewalks
along
Mayor Pro-tem Dickson asked that
the citizens’ comments from the Towns’ website “How to spend tax dollars”
survey, be incorporated into these minutes as addendum pages.
Mary Wells of
There being no further comments,
the public hearing was closed.
Action: The Board made a motion to set a public hearing for
Motion By: Dickson
Second By: Atwell
Vote: Unanimous
A
copy of the citizens comments “How to spend tax dollars” survey is incorporated
into these minutes as addendum pages.
6d. Public
Hearing: Holly Springs Fire Station
Special Exception Use Petition 04-SEU-02 – Ms. Bobber explained that this proposal is for a Special Exception
Use Petition #04-SEU-02 for a 2.45-acre site located north of Holly Springs
Road across from the Spring Meadow subdivision.
She said the proposal is to construct a fire station, which is allowed
in the R-10: Residential District as a Special Exception. She said the request is compatible with the
medium-density designation of the property in the Comprehensive Growth Plan.
Ms.
Bobber said that town staff is currently working with the Moravian Church to
acquire additional right of way easement for a public street connection with
the adjacent Rhamkatt PUD property. She said that in the event that the town can
not obtain the right of way easement from the church, the plan proposes to
construct a temporary gravel access and parking area to the northern side and
rear of the property.
Ms.
Bobber said this project is on a time line to submit approval to the Local
Government Commission. Ms. Bobber reviewed with the Board members the
building materials and elevations of the fire station plan.
Ms. Bobber said the first action is
to accept sworn testimony and qualified evidence on Special Exception Use Petition
#04-SEU-02, Town of Holly Springs Fire Station to allow for the development of
a fire station in R-10; Residential district.
She said the Board is to consider whether the Findings of Fact for the
Special Exception Use Petition to allow for the development of a fire station are
satisfied.
Ms. Bobber explained that the
project meets the development standards of the UDO with the following
exceptions of several waivers and variances for the Board’s consideration:
§
The applicant requests a Waiver of UDO
Regulations in order to allow for the reduction of the varying 2-foot setback
required per 50 linear feet of façade length.
§
The applicant requests a Waiver of UDO
Regulations in order to allow for a reduction in the amount of façade area
dedicated to windows.
§
The applicant requests a Variance of Development
Standards in order to allow for an increase in the maximum building height from
35 feet to 60 feet.
§
The applicant requests a Variance of Development
Standards in order to allow for gravel access drive.
§
The applicant requests a Variance of Development
Standards in order to allow for the increase of the width of the northern
interior access drive from 12 feet to 18 feet.
§
The applicant requests a Variance of Development
Standards in order to allow for the increase of the width of the southern
interior access drive from 12 feet to 24 feet.
§
The applicant requests a Variance of Development
Standards in order to allow for a parking lot in the side and rear yard.
Commissioner
VanFossen suggested that town staff consider amending the UDO to simplify the
approval process for special exception uses, variances and waivers.
Commissioner
VanFossen said that he dislikes the elevations and requested on several
occasions for options of other exterior building materials.
With that explanation completed,
Mayor Sears opened the public hearing to accept sworn testimony under oath
administered by Deputy Clerk
There being no testimony, the
public hearing was closed.
Action #1 Findings of Fact for the Special Exception Use Petition to
allow the development of a fire station: The Board approved a motion to
make, accept and direct the Town Clerk to record in the minutes its findings of
fact that Special Exception Use Petition #04-SEU-02 Town of Holly Springs Fire
Station to allow for the development of a fire station in R:10 Residential
district as submitted by Little Diversified Architectural Consulting Project
Number 514-7960-00, dated revised April 14, 2004.
Motion By: Vanfossen
Second By: Dickson
Vote: Unanimous
Special Exception Use Findings
of Fact:
a. The
proposed use will not be
injurious to the public health, safety, comfort, community moral standards,
convenience or general welfare;
b. The
proposed use will not injure or
adversely affect the adjacent area;
c. The
proposed use will be consistent
with the character of the district,
land uses authorized therein,
and the Town of
d. The
proposed use shall conform to all development
standards of the applicable district
(unless a waiver of such
development standards is
requested as part of the special
exception use petition and approved as set forth above, in which case the
proposed use shall conform to the terms and conditions of such waiver).
e. Access drives or driveways are or will be sufficient
in size and properly located to: ensure automotive and pedestrian safety and
convenience, traffic flow as set forth in Section 7.09 – Pedestrian Circulation
and Vehicular Area Design; and, control and access in case of fire or other
emergency;
f.
Off-street parking areas, off-street loading areas, trash enclosures, trash pick-up and
removal, and other service areas are located so as to be safe, convenient,
allow for access in case of emergency, and to minimize economic, glare, odor,
and other impacts on adjoining properties and properties in the general
neighborhood;
g. The
lot, building or structure proposed
for the use has adequate restroom
facilities, cooking facilities, safety equipment (smoke alarms, floatation
devices, etc.), or any other service or equipment necessary to provide for the
needs of those persons whom may work at, visit or own property nearby to the
proposed use;
h. Utilities,
schools, fire, police and other necessary public and private facilities and
services will be adequate to handle the needs of the proposed use;
i.
The location and arrangement of the use on the site, screening,
buffering, landscaping, and pedestrian ways harmonize with adjoining properties
and the general area and minimize adverse impacts; and,
j.
The type, size, and intensity of the proposed use (including but not limited to
such considerations as the hours of operation and numbers of people who are
likely to utilize or be attracted to the use)
will not have significant adverse impacts on adjoining properties or the
neighborhood.
Action #2: Findings of Fact: Waiver of UDO regulations to reduce the
varying 2-foot setback per 50 linear feet of façade length. The Board made a motion to make, accept
the Findings of Fact and direct the Town Clerk to record the Findings in the
minutes for a waiver to reduce the varying 2-foot setback per 50 linear feet of
façade length in association with #04-SEU-02 Town of Holly Springs Fire Station
as submitted by Little Diversified Architectural Consulting Project Number
514-7960-00, dated revised April 14, 2004.
Motion By: VanFossen
Second By: Atwell
Vote: Unanimous
Action #3: Action on waiver of UDO regulations to reduce the
varying 2-foot setback per 50 linear feet of façade length. The Board made a motion to approve having
made findings of fact that the Petition meets the requirements to be granted a
Waiver of Standards of UDO Section 3.01, C., 1., c., (3)., (a)., (ii), Colors,
Texture, and Architecture. NV Neighborhood Village District: Architectural and
Site Design Review, the Board approved a motion to approve the reduction of
varying setback in façade length for Special Exception Use Petition #04-SEU-02
Town of Holly Springs Fire Station.
Motion By: VanFossen
Second By: Atwell
Vote: Unanimous
Waiver of UDO Regulations Findings
of Fact:
1. The
proposed development represents the use of (building materials, colors, textures, building architecture, building
orientation, roof features, façade modulation, signs, landscaping, lighting or pedestrian circulation and
vehicular area design) which will result in a development pattern which is
equivalent to or superior to that achievable under the applicable regulations;
2. The
proposed development will be compatible with and will enhance the use or value of area;
3. The
proposed development is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan; and,
4. The
proposed development is consistent with the intent and purpose of this UDO.
Action #4:
Waiver of UDO regulations to reduce the amount of façade area dedicated
to windows. The Board made a motion
to make, accept the Findings of Fact and direct the Town Clerk to record the
Findings in the minutes for a waiver to reduce amount of façade area dedicated
to windows in association with #04-SEU-02 Town of Holly Springs Fire Station as
submitted by Little Diversified Architectural Consulting Project Number
514-7960-00, dated revised April 14, 2004.
Motion By: VanFossen
Second By: Atwell
Vote: Unanimous
Action #5: Action on Waiver of
UDO regulations to reduce the amount of façade area dedicated to windows. Having made findings of fact that the Petition
meets the requirements be granted a Waiver of Standards of UDO Section 3.01,
C., 1., c., (3)., (a)., (iv). NV Neighborhood Village District: Architectural
and Site Design Review, the Board approved a motion to approve the reduction in
the amount of façade area dedicated to windows for Special Exception Use
Petition #04-SEU-02 Town of Holly Springs Fire Station.
Motion By: VanFossen
Second By: Womble
Vote: Unanimous
Waiver of UDO Regulations, Architectural and Site Design
Review Findings of Fact:
1. The
proposed development represents the use of (building materials, colors, textures, building architecture, building
orientation, roof features, façade modulation, signs, landscaping, lighting or pedestrian circulation and
vehicular area design) which will result in a development pattern which is
equivalent to or superior to that achievable under the applicable regulations;
2. The
proposed development will be compatible with and will enhance the use or value of area;
3. The
proposed development is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan; and,
4. The
proposed development is consistent with the intent and purpose of this UDO.
Action #6: Variance of Development
Standards to increase building height. The Board made a motion to approve
to make, accept the Findings of Fact and direct the Town Clerk to record the
Findings in the minutes for a variance to increase building height in
association with #04-SEU-02 Town of
Motion By: VanFossen
Second By: Womble
Vote: Unanimous
Action #7: Action on Variance of Development Standards to increase building
height. Having made findings of fact
that the Petition meets the requirements and to grant a Variance to the
Development Standards of UDO Section 2.04, B., 7., a. R-10: Residential
District, the Board approved a motion to approve to increase the building
height from 35 to 60 feet for Special Exception Use Petition #04-SEU-02 Town of
Holly Springs Fire Station.
Motion By: Dickson
Second By: Atwell
Vote: Unanimous
Variance of Building Height Development Standards
Findings of Fact:
1. The carrying out of the strict letter of the
UDO will result in practical difficulties in the development of the property
included in the Variance Petition;
2. Approval will observe the spirit of the UDO;
3. Approval will secure public safety and
welfare;
4. Approval will provide substantial justice;
5. a. There are
exceptional conditions pertaining to the particular piece of property in
question because of its shape, size, or topography, that are not applicable to
other lands, buildings, or structures in the same district, or
b. There is a peculiar characteristic of
a proposed use which makes the application of certain development standards of
the UDO, as requested in the petition for variance of development standards,
unrealistic;
6. Granting the Variance requested will not
confer any special privileges that are denied to other owners or residents of
the district in which the property is located;
7. A literal interpretation of the provisions of
the UDO would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other owners
and residents of the district in which the property is located;
8. The requested variance will be in harmony
with the purpose and intent of the UDO and will not be injurious to neighbor or
to the general welfare;
9. The special circumstances giving rise to the
Variance request are not as a result of actions of the Applicant; AND
10. Variance
Requested is the minimum variance that will make possible the legal use of the
land, building, or structure.
Action #8: Variance of Development
Standards to allow a gravel access drive:
The Board made a motion to make, accept the Findings of Fact and
direct the Town Clerk to record the Findings in the minutes for a variance to
allow a gravel access drive in association with #04-SEU-02 Town of Holly
Springs Fire Station as submitted by Little Diversified Architectural
Consulting Project Number 514-7960-00, dated revised April 14, 2004.
Motion By:
Second By: Womble
Vote: Unanimous
Action #9: Action on Variance of
Development Standards to allow a gravel access drive. Having made findings of
fact that the Petition meets the requirements to grant a Variance of
Development Standards of UDO Section 7.07, b., 22. Street Design and
Right-of-Way Designation, the Board approved a motion to approve a gravel
access drive for Special Exception Use Petition #04-SEU-02 Town of Holly
Springs Fire Station.
Motion By: Dickson
Second By: Atwell
Vote: Unanimous
Variance of Street Design and
Right-of-Way Designation of the Development Standards Findings of Fact:
1. The carrying out of the strict letter of the
UDO will result in practical difficulties in the development of the property
included in the Variance Petition;
2. Approval will observe the spirit of the UDO;
3. Approval will secure public safety and
welfare;
4. Approval will provide substantial justice;
5. a. There are
exceptional conditions pertaining to the particular piece of property in
question because of its shape, size, or topography, that are not applicable to
other lands, buildings, or structures in the same district, or
b. There is a peculiar characteristic of
a proposed use which makes the application of certain development standards of
the UDO, as requested in the petition for variance of development standards,
unrealistic;
6. Granting the Variance requested will not
confer any special privileges that are denied to other owners or residents of
the district in which the property is located;
7. A literal interpretation of the provisions of
the UDO would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other owners
and residents of the district in which the property is located;
8. The requested variance will be in harmony
with the purpose and intent of the UDO and will not be injurious to neighbor or
to the general welfare;
9. The special circumstances giving rise to the
Variance request are not as a result of actions of the Applicant; AND
10. Variance
Requested is the minimum variance that will make possible the legal use of the
land, building, or structure.
Action #10: Variance of
Development Standards to increase the northern interior access drive from 12
feet to 18 feet. The board made a
motion to make, accept the Findings of Fact and direct the Town Clerk to record
the Findings in the minutes for a variance to allow the increase of the width
of the northern interior access drive from 12 feet to 18 feet in association
with #04-SEU-02 Town of Holly Springs Fire Station as submitted by Little
Diversified Architectural Consulting Project Number 514-7960-00, dated revised
April 14, 2004.
Motion By: Dickson
Second By: Atwell
Vote: Unanimous
Action #11: Action on Variance of Development Standards
to increase the northern interior access drive from 12 feet to 18 feet. Having made findings of
fact that the Petition meets the requirements to grant a Variance of
Development Standards of UDO Section 2.04, B., 6. b. R-10: Residential
District. Street Design and Right-of-Way Designation, the Board approved a
motion to approve to increase the width of the northern interior access drive
for Special Exception Use Petition #04-SEU-02 Town of Holly Springs Fire
Station.
Motion By: Dickson
Second By: Atwell
Vote: Unanimous
Variance of Street Design and Right-of-Way Designation of
the Development Standards Findings of Fact:
1. The carrying out of the strict letter of the
UDO will result in practical difficulties in the development of the property
included in the Variance Petition;
2. Approval will observe the spirit of the UDO;
3. Approval will secure public safety and
welfare;
4. Approval will provide substantial justice;
5. a. There are
exceptional conditions pertaining to the particular piece of property in
question because of its shape, size, or topography, that are not applicable to
other lands, buildings, or structures in the same district, or
b. There is a peculiar characteristic of
a proposed use which makes the application of certain development standards of
the UDO, as requested in the petition for variance of development standards,
unrealistic;
6. Granting the Variance requested will not
confer any special privileges that are denied to other owners or residents of
the district in which the property is located;
7. A literal interpretation of the provisions of
the UDO would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other owners
and residents of the district in which the property is located;
8. The requested variance will be in harmony
with the purpose and intent of the UDO and will not be injurious to neighbor or
to the general welfare;
9. The special circumstances giving rise to the
Variance request are not as a result of actions of the Applicant; AND
10. Variance
Requested is the minimum variance that will make possible the legal use of the
land, building, or structure.
Action #12: Variance of Development Standards to increase
the southern interior access drive from 12 feet to 24 feet. The Board made a motion to make, accept
the Findings of Fact and direct the Town Clerk to record the Findings in the
minutes for a variance to allow the increase of the width of the southern
interior access drive from 12 feet to 24 feet in association with #04-SEU-02
Town of Holly Springs Fire Station as submitted by Little Diversified
Architectural Consulting Project Number 514-7960-00, dated revised April 14,
2004.
Motion By: VanFossen
Second By: Atwell
Vote: Unanimous
Action #13:
Action on Variance of Development Standards to increase the southern
interior access drive from 12 feet to 24 feet.
Having made Findings of Fact that the Petition meets the
requirements to grant a Variance of Development Standards of UDO Section 2.04,
B., 6., b. R-10: Residential District. Street Design
and Right-of-Way Designation, the Board approved to increase the width of the
southern interior access drive for Special Exception Use Petition #04-SEU-02
Town of
Motion By: Womble
Second By: Atwell
Vote: Unanimous
Variance of Street Design and Right-of-Way Designation Development
Standards Findings of Fact:
1. The carrying out of the strict letter of the
UDO will result in practical difficulties in the development of the property
included in the Variance Petition;
2. Approval will observe the spirit of the UDO;
3. Approval will secure public safety and
welfare;
4. Approval will provide substantial justice;
5. a. There are
exceptional conditions pertaining to the particular piece of property in
question because of its shape, size, or topography, that are not applicable to
other lands, buildings, or structures in the same district, or
b. There is a peculiar characteristic of
a proposed use which makes the application of certain development standards of
the UDO, as requested in the petition for variance of development standards,
unrealistic;
6. Granting the Variance requested will not
confer any special privileges that are denied to other owners or residents of
the district in which the property is located;
7. A literal interpretation of the provisions of
the UDO would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other owners
and residents of the district in which the property is located;
8. The requested variance will be in harmony
with the purpose and intent of the UDO and will not be injurious to neighbor or
to the general welfare;
9. The special circumstances giving rise to the
Variance request are not as a result of actions of the Applicant; AND
10. Variance
Requested is the minimum variance that will make possible the legal use of the
land, building, or structure.
Action #14:
Variance of Development Standards to allow a parking lot in a side yard. The Board made a motion to make and
accept the Findings of Fact and direct the Town Clerk to record the Findings in
the minutes for a variance to allow for a parking lot in a side yard in
association with #04-SEU-02 Town of Holly Springs Fire Station as submitted by
Little Diversified Architectural Consulting Project Number 514-7960-00, dated
revised April 14, 2004.
Motion By: Dickson
Second By: Atwell
Vote: Unanimous
Action #15: Action on Variance
of Development Standards to allow a parking lot in a side yard. Having made Findings of Fact that the
Petition meets the requirements to grant a Variance of Development Standards of
UDO Section 2.04, B., 6., b. R-10: Residential
District. Street Design and Right-of-Way Designation, the Board approved a
motion to approve the location of a parking lot in a side yard for Special
Exception Use Petition #04-SEU-02 Town of Holly Springs Fire Station.
Motion By: VanFossen
Second By: Womble
Vote: Unanimous
Variance of Street Design and Right-of-Way Designation of
the Development Standards Findings of Fact:
1. The carrying out of the strict letter of the
UDO will result in practical difficulties in the development of the property
included in the Variance Petition;
2. Approval will observe the spirit of the UDO;
3. Approval will secure public safety and
welfare;
4. Approval will provide substantial justice;
5. a. There are
exceptional conditions pertaining to the particular piece of property in
question because of its shape, size, or topography, that are not applicable to
other lands, buildings, or structures in the same district, or
b. There is a peculiar characteristic of
a proposed use which makes the application of certain development standards of
the UDO, as requested in the petition for variance of development standards,
unrealistic;
6. Granting the Variance requested will not
confer any special privileges that are denied to other owners or residents of
the district in which the property is located;
7. A literal interpretation of the provisions of
the UDO would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other owners
and residents of the district in which the property is located;
8. The requested variance will be in harmony
with the purpose and intent of the UDO and will not be injurious to neighbor or
to the general welfare;
9. The special circumstances giving rise to the
Variance request are not as a result of actions of the Applicant; AND
10. Variance
Requested is the minimum variance that will make possible the legal use of the
land, building, or structure.
Action #16:
Variance of Development Standards to allow a parking lot in a rear yard. The Board made a motion to make, accept the
Findings of Fact and direct the Town Clerk to record the Findings in the
minutes for a variance to allow for a parking lot in a rear yard in association
with #04-SEU-02 Town of Holly Springs Fire Station as submitted by Little
Diversified Architectural Consulting Project Number 514-7960-00, dated revised
April 14, 2004.
Motion By: Dickson
Second By: Atwell
Vote: Unanimous
Action #17: Action on Variance
of Development Standards to allow a parking lot in a rear yard. Having made findings of Fact that the
Petition meets the requirements to grant a Variance of Development Standards of
UDO Section 2.04, B., 6., c. R-10: Residential
District. Street Design and Right-of-Way Designation, the Board approved a
motion to approve the location of a parking lot in a rear yard for Special
Exception Use Petition #04-SEU-02 Town of Holly Springs Fire Station.
Motion By: Dickson
Second By: Atwell
Vote: Unanimous
Variance of Street Design and Right-of-Way Designation Development
Standards Findings of Fact:
1. The carrying out of the strict letter of the
UDO will result in practical difficulties in the development of the property
included in the Variance Petition;
2. Approval will observe the spirit of the UDO;
3. Approval will secure public safety and welfare;
4. Approval will provide substantial justice;
5. a. There are
exceptional conditions pertaining to the particular piece of property in
question because of its shape, size, or topography, that are not applicable to
other lands, buildings, or structures in the same district, or
b. There is a peculiar characteristic of
a proposed use which makes the application of certain development standards of
the UDO, as requested in the petition for variance of development standards,
unrealistic;
6. Granting the Variance requested will not
confer any special privileges that are denied to other owners or residents of
the district in which the property is located;
7. A literal interpretation of the provisions of
the UDO would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other owners
and residents of the district in which the property is located;
8. The requested variance will be in harmony
with the purpose and intent of the UDO and will not be injurious to neighbor or
to the general welfare;
9. The special circumstances giving rise to the
Variance request are not as a result of actions of the Applicant; AND
10. Variance
Requested is the minimum variance that will make possible the legal use of the
land, building, or structure.
Action #18:
Holly Springs Fire Station Special Exception Use: Having made findings of fact that the
project meets the requirements to be granted a Special Exception Use, and
having granted specific Waivers of UDO Regulations and Variances of Development
Standards as requested, the Board approved a motion to approve Special
Exception Use Petition #04-SEU-02 Town of Holly Springs Fire Station as
submitted by Little Diversified Architectural Consulting Project Number
514-7960-00, dated revised April 14, 2004 with the following conditions:
Motion By: VanFossen
Second By: Atwell
Vote: Unanimous
A
copy of
7a. Community
Center/Indoor Programming Needs Report - Mr. Bradley explained to the Board
that Heery International would be giving the final
needs assessment for the community center indoor programming. Mr.
Bradley said the board is to consider approval of a design concept on the
community arts center and to allow Little Diversified Architectural Consulting
to proceed with the design.
Mr. Joe Wynn of Heery
addressed the Board with the functional requirements of the community center
would be space for the following activities: a performing arts theater, a large
multi-purpose meeting space, small group meeting rooms, commercial warming
kitchen and office and support spaces totaling 5,387 square feet of gross
building area. He said that the main
functional requirements for the recreational facility would be a gymnasium with
elevated running track, a competition indoor swimming pool, fitness room,
aerobics room, locker and shower facilities, staff administrative offices,
concessions, classrooms, childcare center and support spaces that totals 66,600
square feet of gross building area.
David King of Heery
International reviewed the design concepts of the existing
Commissioners talked about some of
the specifics of the proposed facilities.
Commissioner
Atwell said he understands that the town is faced with phasing the project or
having to choose the cultural arts facility due to partnering with
Mayor Sears at this time yielded the floor to residents who wanted to address
the community center and recreation center.
Kathy Hamilton Brown of 324 Hallwood Court, a member of the
Commissioner VanFossen asked the
town to do a news release to clarify the two types of centers and their
programming uses.
Commissioner Atwell said for
clarification the Library Bond that was voted by the people was for funding of
the library only and the construction of the cultural arts center is a separate
cost to the Town of Holly Springs and not part of the bond referendum.
Mr. Dean said the Board can discuss
this item at the budget workshop.
Action: The Board directed town staff to proceed with the
7b. FY 2004-05 Proposed Budget -- Mr. Dean
distributed his recommended FY 2004‑05 Town budget for the Board's
review. He said in order to accommodate
the Town Board members’ questions and suggestions for revisions to the budget
plan, a budget workshop should be scheduled.
Mr. Dean said that the Town has
experienced a great deal of positive growth over the past several years
enhancing the Town’s ability to improve services provided to its citizens. He said that as the Town continues to
develop, a vision should be maintained as to how the community will grow while
maintaining the quality of life expected by its citizens. He said that this vision should include
quality services and programs that address the needs of citizens, economic
development in keeping with our community, and adequate infrastructure to meet
the requirements of our growing Town. Mr.
Dean said that the proposed budget is designed to meet the needs for the next
year. He reviewed the revenues and
utility funds; and the expenditures of the general and utility funds with the
Board members.
Mr. Dean said that the salary
requirements for next year include a recommended 2% cost of living adjustment
(COLA) across the
Mr. Dean said that the employee
health insurance has been budgeted at an 11.7% increase in the rates for next
year, which is a target number at this time. He said the insurance costs are increasing
dramatically, and staff is presently unsure what the final number will be. He said that staff is proposing to raise the
Town’s portion of employee’s rate from $25 to $40 for employee dependent
costs. He said that the town is also
checking the insurance market for additional quotes to insure these rates are
competitive.
Mr. Dean said that with the current
economic environment, our goal is to create a budget that will maintain and improve
services to citizens while still controlling the costs for these services. He said that he feels the Town has a solid
and conservative budget for next year.
Mr. Dean said that as part of the
budget process, staff feels it is important to have new residential
developments absorb additional expenses for infrastructure rather than passing
costs on to existing citizens. He said
to that end, the town is proposing to increase the transportation fees from
$900 to $1000 in order to address immediate transportation needs. He said that in addition, the town is
proposing to remove the water acreage fees from the operating budget to go
directly into reserve accounts. He said
that it is important that the Town gradually reduce dependence of impact fees
and charges for operating expenses and to continue to attempt reducing these
charges in future budgets to eliminate potential financial problems within the
operating budget.
Mr. Dean said that as town staff proceeds
into the next several years, staff will continue to evaluate projects and
personnel needs as they relate to the provision of services. He said the town still has several
substantial projects (WWTP, library/cultural arts center, fire station) which
will need to be addressed during this time period, therefore it will be
important to prioritize programming needs with future budgets. Mr. Dean said that he will continue to work
with the Board, staff, and citizens to establish our goals and objectives as
the Town grows to provide the level of services expected.
Mr. Dean said that Town staff has
been instrumental in the development of this document, and feels they have done
a good job of controlling costs while providing service levels expected by the
Town Board and our citizens. Mr. Dean
said that this budget is his best estimate of what the town should expect next
year, and feels it represents a fair assessment of our anticipated revenues and
expenditures.
Mr. Dean said that this budget
reflects staffs recommendations based on department meetings, evaluation of
existing service needs, and input from the Town Board. He said that he would like to say a special
thanks to our Town department heads—especially finance director
Mr. Dean said that the FY 2004-2005
Budget represents a level of funding that will allow the Town to maintain and
improve current service levels while making organizational changes, which
should be cost effective and more efficient.
He said that it is important to note that with any budget, external
forces can effect these projections, and it is for that reason that the figures
proposed in the FY 2004-2005 Budget are a very conservative forecast of our
revenues and expenditures for the next year.
Mr. Dean said that the next step
is to set a date for a budget workshop to discuss the proposed budged and to
continue discussion on the proposed cultural arts and community centers.
Action:
The Board made a motion to set a budget workshop for
Motion By: Atwell
Second By: Dickson
Vote: Unanimous
8. Consent Agenda: All remaining items on the Consent Agenda
were approved following a motion by Commissioner Dickson a second by Commissioner
Atwell and a unanimous vote. The
following actions were affected:
8a. Resolution 04-23 ‑ Resolution 04-23 authorizing the Town
Clerk to investigate the sufficiency of annexation petition A04-06 filed by Lattie F. and Renee Floyd and set a public hearing on the
proposed annexation for May 18, 2004 was adopted. A copy
of Resolution 04-23 is incorporated into these minutes as addendum pages.
8b. 2004-05 Town of
8c. Recreation Advisory Committee Appointment
– The Board appointed Randy Adamson to serve on the Recreation Advisory
Committee for a term to expire
8d. World Changers and Budget
Amendment, $9,800 – The Board approved authorizing the use of $9,800 for
the community improvement project proposed in partnership with World Changers
and adopted a budget amendment in the amount of $9,800.
A copy of the World Changers
project list and budget amendment is incorporated into these minutes as
addendum pages.
9. Unfinished Business: Sunset Oaks PUD Amendment, 02-PUD-02-A02
- Removed from New Business during Agenda Adjustment to be considered at the
10a. Town of
Commissioner
Atwell asked if the town should proceed forward with the approval of the plan without
the right of way dedication to the rear of the property. Commissioner Dickson said the town has the
option of condemning the property. Ms.
Bobber said the Boards’ decision does not lock the town into this proposed plan. She said the Board can approve the concept of
the right of way at the rear of the property.
Action: The Board approved a motion to approve Preliminary Plan
#04-MAS-01 for a subdivision and a new public street for the Town of
Motion By: Atwell
Second By: Womble
Vote: Unanimous
10b. Sunset Oaks, Phase
12, 04-MAS-05 – - Removed from New Business during Agenda Adjustment to be
considered at the
10c. Sunset Oaks Activity Center, 04-DP-01- Ms. Bailey said that this proposal is for the
approval of Development Plan 04-DP-01, Sunset Oaks Activity Center for a 5.97
acre site located in Sunset Oaks PUD on Optimist Farm Road. She said the developer is proposing to build
an activity center with a clubhouse, pool, waterslide, and shelter. Ms. Bailey said the plan is compatible with the
medium-density residential growth and meets the requirements of the Ten Year
Comprehensive Growth Plan.
Ms. Bailey said that a 25-foot Type
C-75 opaque landscape buffer is provided along
Ms. Bailey said the building will
primarily be made of red hardiplank siding with a
board and batten look. She said the
foundation will be of cultured stone and the roof of gray standing-seam metal.
Ms. Bailey said that a 4 foot decorative
aluminum or wrought iron fence is proposed to encompass the pool area; the UDO
states that the minimum height for a fence surrounding a pool is 5 feet. She said that this discrepancy is addressed
in a condition of approval.
Mr. Jim Earnhart the developer of Sunset Oaks said that this
project is in the early planning stages and request the board to be flexible in
the color of the proposed siding, roof materials, and the foundation materials.
Mr.
Earnhart asked for clarification of the following comment
“Construction easements for future widening of
Ms. Sudano explained to the Board that
this is only a recommendation for a temporary construction easement for future
widening and development. She said the meaning
is to dedicate additional 5 feet for a temporary construction easement on the
site plan for future widening. She said
that the easement will convert back to the property owner after the roadway is constructed.
Commissioners talked about some of
the specifics of dedicating temporary construction easements and felt there was
not a need to implement that policy at this time.
Action: The Board approved a motion to approve Development
#04-DP-01 for Sunset Oaks Activity Center as submitted by Tony M. Tate
Landscape Architect, PA, dated Revised April 4, 2004, with the following conditions:
§
Pool drain details
§
Show plantings outside the NRB
§
Construction
easements for future widening of
§
Developer to work with town staff for suitable
building materials and building elevations.
Motion By: Atwell
Second By:
Vote: Unanimous
At this time Commissioner Atwell
made a motion to excuse Commissioner VanFossen.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Dickson, and the vote was
unanimous.
10d. Holly Springs
Medical Center, 00-COM-18-A02 Amendment - Ms.
Bobber explained that this proposal is for the approval of an amendment
to Development Plan #00-COM-18-A02 Holly Springs Medical Center to implement a
Master Sign plan for the medical facility located at the intersection of Holly
Springs Road and Johnson Street. She
said the Master Sign plan includes a request for a waiver to utilize the square
footage that would have been allowed for wall signs to increase the size of the
ground signs in accordance with the provisions of the UDO. She said the plan
will utilize the same style ground signs that were approved under the former Holly
Springs Zoning Ordinance and that is presently located on the property.
Mr. VanFossen said the request is for a waiver to
utilize the square footage that would have been allowed for wall signs to
increase the size of a ground sign in accordance with the provisions of the UDO.
Commissioners talked about some of
the designs and size of the existing sign and the proposed sign.
Action #1: Waiver of UDO
regulations to utilize the square footage allowed for wall signs to increase
the ground sign size. The Board made
a motion to make, accept the Findings of Fact and direct the Town Clerk to
record the Findings in the minutes to allow for a waiver to utilize the square
footage allowed for wall signs to increase the ground sign size in accordance
with the regulation of UDO Section 7.03 Sign Regulations in association with
Development Plan #00-COM-18-A02 Holly Springs Medical Center as submitted by
Chet Van Fossen.
Motion By: Atwell
Second By:
Vote: Unanimous
Action #2: Action on Waiver of
UDO regulations to utilize the square footage allowed for wall signs to
increase the ground sign size. The
Board made a motion to approve having made the findings of fact that the
Petition meets the requirements be granted a Waiver of regulations of UDO
Section 7.03 Sign Regulations, the Board made a motion to approved to utilize
the square footage allowed for wall signs to increase the ground sign size for Development
Plan #00-COM-18-A02 Holly Springs Medical Center as submitted by Chet Van
Fossen, dated received April 13, 2004 with the following condition:
1.
A UDO Permit for Sign Installation shall be obtained
from the Department of Planning & Zoning prior to the installation of any
signage.
2.
The architect work with Town staff on the design and
size of the sign.
Motion By: Atwell
Second By: Womble
Vote: Unanimous
Waiver Findings of Fact of UDO regulations to utilize the
square footage allowed for wall signs to increase the ground sign size.
(1)
The Proposed Signs are harmonious with
the buildings and sites they occupy;
(2)
The Proposed Signs will not create a
hazard to motorists or pedestrians resulting from the sign, location, size or
configuration;
(3)
The Proposed Signs will not increase
the total combined sign surface area allowed for the front sign zone, interior
sign zone and building signs on the lot, out lot, integrated center, business
park, industrial park, subdivision or building served by the proposed signs;
(4)
The Proposed Signs will result in an
overall pattern of signs for the lot, out lot, integrated center, business
park, industrial park, subdivision or building which is equivalent or superior
to that achievable under the applicable regulations;
(5)
The proposed signs will be compatible
with and will enhance the use or value of area properties;
(6)
The proposed signs are consistent with
the intent of the Comprehensive Plan;
and
(7)
The proposed signs are consistent with
the intent and purpose of this UDO.
Commissioner Atwell made a motion to
readmit Commissioner VanFossen. The
motion was seconded by Commissioner Dickson, and the vote was unanimous.
10e. Sunset Oaks, Phase 12 Developers
Agreement Amendment - Ms. Sudano explained the request before the Board is an
amendment to the Sunset Oaks PUD developers’ agreement. She said that when the
original PUD was approved, a developer agreement was also approved which set
forth terms that also apply to development.
Ms.
Sudano said that the developer is requesting that Sunset Oaks Phase 12 be
approved by the Town under the same conditions, and therefore be added to the
developer agreement. She explained to
the Board the following amendments:
(1) A fixed (reduced) payment in
lieu fee for downstream sewer improvements in the
amount
of $1100 be paid for each unit developed; approval for the payment of the fee
to be delayed until issuance of building permit for each unit; this fee is
specified to have an ultimate cap of $900,000 (this maximum amount/cap will
remain the same);
(2) The developer shall be required
to re-align the nearby (off-site)
intersection with Sunset Lake Road (in accordance with terms
of the developer agreement) in place of widening the roadway frontages along
the project as required by Town ordinance;
under terms of the agreement payments of street fees-in-lieu
specifically may not be credited against the off-site intersection improvements
or any other roadway improvements required for the project, and must be paid to
the Town;
(3) The requirements for a
waterline extension along the frontage of the existing
roadways (Exhibit B will need to be
amended in this instance);
(4) The requirements for right of
way dedication along the frontage of the existing
roadways (Exhibit D will need to be
amended in this instance);
(5) Reservation of sewer capacity
for 600 units shall be guaranteed by the Town (the
number of units shall remain the
same);
(6) The recreation fees-in-lieu
will be credited in exchange for dedication of land for
greenways and open areas.
Ms. Sudano said that all other
terms of the agreement would also apply to Sunset Oaks Phase 12.
Action: The Board made a motion to approve
the amendments of the Sunset Oaks Phase 12 developers’ agreement as listed
above.
Motion By: Atwell
Second By: Womble
Vote: Unanimous
A copy of Sunset
Oaks Developers Agreement amendment is incorporated into these minutes as
addendum pages.
Mr. Tayler said that he discussed with
Time Warner the issue of interconnectivity between the Town facilities to
improve efficiency and capabilities. He
said the estimated cost for connecting the -- Town Hall, Public Works and
Mr. Tayler said that the installation
cost of the fiber optic cable would be $7,000 and that he would recommend
approval of using method one - using a leased fiber
optic line with Time Warner Cable.
Mr.
John Moore of Time Warner Cable Commercial Services reviewed with the Board
members the following: how fiber optic works, the fiber optic relay system, the
transmitter, and the regenerator and receiver.
Mr. Moore said the advantages of using fiber optic system are the town
would be the owner of the cable; it would be less expensive, thinner than using
copper wire, higher carrying capacity, less signal degradation, low power,
digital signals, non-flammable, lightweight and flexible for the use of digital
camera for medical imaging, mechanical imaging and plumbing for sewer line
inspections. Mr. Moore said the service
agreement would be to connect three (3) town facilities; Town Hall located at
Mr.
Dean said pursuant to the Town Board's discussion at the annual retreat, staff
obtained information regarding implementing a wireless internet access
"hotspot" in town which would allow users with mobile devices
(laptops, PDAs) to access the internet and town
website via wireless connection in certain areas of town, such as the downtown
core. Mr. Dean said that Randy Choplin of Windchannel
Communications is a local vendor of wireless technology will present a proposal
and presentation of the possibility of connecting certain town facilities for
same services.
Mr.
Randy Choplin, CEO of Windchannel
presented the Board with a power point presentation proposing to interconnect
certain town facilities such as the Wastewater Treatment Plant and
Action: The Board approved a motion to authorize
staff to negotiate a contract with WindChannel
Communications for interconnection of phones and data services to the Town
facilities (Town Hall, Public Works, W. E. Hunt Center, Wastewater Treatment
Plant and Fire Station) for the installation of Private Broadband System and
Public WiFi access systems in the amount of $20,530
and a monthly cost of $1,250.00.
Motion By: VanFossen
Second By: Atwell
Vote: Unanimous
A copy of Wind
Channel Communication proposed quote is incorporated into these minutes as
addendum pages.
10g. NC
55/Holly Springs Road Intersection, and Holly Springs Road from Johnson Street
to Holly Crossing Shopping Center Project -
Ms. Stephenson said the proposal is for a contract for professional services for the
materials and testing services for the NC 55/Holly Springs Road intersection
and Holly Springs Road from Johnson Street to Holly Crossing shopping center. Ms. Stephenson said the services include; the sub
grade and asphalt density and thickness testing as well as concrete psi testing. She
said this type of specialized testing is required from a licensed testing
professional with approved testing equipment, is necessary for all roadway
construction work performed within the NCDOT right of way. Ms. Stephenson said
the town inspectors will be providing all other inspections.
Action: The Board approved a motion to enter a professional
services agreement with Geo Technologies, Inc., in an amount of $17,577 (contingency
not included) for materials and testing for the
Motion By: Atwell
Second By: Dickson
Vote: Unanimous
A copy of the Geo
Technologies, Inc., agreement is incorporated into these minutes as addendum
pages.
10h. Sunset Lake Road/Holly Springs Road
Project – Ms. Stephenson said that this
request is for approval of a contract for professional services for
materials and testing required by North Carolina Department of Transportation
(NCDOT), on the Sunset Lake Road and Holly Springs Road intersection project. She said that the services include; the sub
grade and asphalt density and thickness testing as well as concrete psi testing. She said this type of technical testing is
required from a licensed testing professional with the approved testing
equipment is necessary for all roadway construction work performed within the
NCDOT right of way. She said the Town inspectors will be providing all other
required inspections and oversight.
Action: The
Board approved a motion to enter a professional services agreement with
Engineering Consulting Services, LTD, in an amount of $14,239.00 (includes
contingency) for materials and testing for the Sunset Lake Road and Holly
Springs Road intersection project.
Motion By: Atwell
Second By: VanFossen
Vote: Unanimous
A copy of the Engineering
Consulting Services, LTD, agreement is incorporated into these minutes as
addendum pages.
The
Board considered the consent agenda item 8b at this time.
10i. 2004-05 Town of
Ms. Stephenson said that the Town
Board approved the Town's last TIP request list a couple of years ago, and was
permitted to include 9 projects (in 3 different categories) on the list. She said this year, the Town is permitted to
submit a TIP list including 20 projects (in 4 different categories), increased
due to the Town's increased population.
She said that all MPO members' lists will be evaluated and ranked by
CAMPO and then submitted in one list to NCDOT as a request for funding and
construction over the next 7 years.
Ms. Stephenson reviewed the draft
summary of staff’s recommended projects, as well as a sheet describing the
location of each requested project.
Commissioner VanFossen asked why is
there two sidewalks proposed for
After much discussion among the
Board, the Board decided to leave the plan as presented.
Action: The
Board approved a motion to approve of the
Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) list to be submitted to Capital
Area Metropolitan Planning Organization CAMPO.
Motion By: Atwell
Second By: Womble
Vote: Unanimous
11. Public
Comment: This section of the agenda was
addressed when the Town Board allowed citizens desiring to speak to do so
earlier in the meeting.
12. Other Business: Mr. Schifano asked the Board to consider adoption of Resolution 04-24 authorizing the Town to
condemn property for obtaining right of way in the
Action: The
Board made a motion to adopt Resolution 04-24 authorizing the town to condemn property
for obtaining right of way in the
Motion By: VanFossen
Second By: Dickson
Vote: Unanimous
A copy of the
Resolution 04-24 is incorporated into these minutes as addendum pages.
Mr.
Schifano said that the Planning Board has expressed an interest to meet with
the Town Board to clarify the expectations of the Planning Board.
Commissioner VanFossen said that he
felt one of the Planning Board concerns was that the board was not included in
the Comprehensive Land Use Plan revisions.
Commissioners talked about setting
a date to meet with the Planning Board and to get back with the Board for
scheduling.
Commissioner
VanFossen gave a report on the rail system and it concerned him how the money
is being spent.
Commissioner
Womble said that he was uncomfortable with the appearance of the properties within
the industrial park and that the area needs to be cleaned up. Mr. Schifano said he was in the process of submitting
a law suit on the General Concrete property to bring them into compliance and
the town could look into the other properties as well.
Commissioner
Womble asked if there were additional money or bonds that could be used for a
mini-park for property within the
13.
Manager’s Reports: Mr. Dean invited
the Commissioners to the Towns’ employee health fair on
14.
Closed Session: None.
15.
Adjournment: There being no further business for the evening, the
Respectfully Submitted on
_________________________________
Addendum pages as referenced in these minutes follow and are a
part of the official record.